Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Williams, 771 N.W.2d 514.

176 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Tony Xiong Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Tony Xiong Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Earvin Ainwin Wright Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Earvin Ainwin Wright Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Don Antoine Jones 848 N.W.2d 528 Minn. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Don Antoine Jones 848 N.W.2d 528 Minn. 2014
State v. Zornes 831 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 2013
State v. Zornes 831 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 2013
State v. Watson 829 N.W.2d 626 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Watson 829 N.W.2d 626 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
§ 609.035 is a question of law, which we review de novo.”); (applying de novo standard of review to interpretation of section 609.035 and the sentencing guidelines).
State v. Campbell 814 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2012
State v. Campbell 814 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2012
State v. Craig 807 N.W.2d 453 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Craig 807 N.W.2d 453 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
-19 (Minn.2009) (declining to abandon the “whole person” test and determining that a prior controlled-sub-stanee offense was admissible to impeach the defendant, who had been charged with illegally possessing a firearm, assault, and robbery because it allowed the jury to better assess the truth of defendant’s test
State v. Hill 801 N.W.2d 646 Minn. 2011
State v. Hill 801 N.W.2d 646 Minn. 2011
See, -67 (Minn.1993); -47 (Minn.1984).
State v. Weaver 796 N.W.2d 561 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Weaver 796 N.W.2d 561 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
If a defendant commits an offense that is an identified exception to the prohibition against cumulative punishment under section 609.035, “he or she may be convicted and sentenced for other offenses that arise out of the same behavioral incident.”
Rohmiller v. Hart 799 N.W.2d 612 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Rohmiller v. Hart 799 N.W.2d 612 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
of Chiropractic Exam’ (applying canon to statutory list of professional services and (applying canon to statute on appointment of public defenders); (applying canon to sentencing guidelines); Nelson v. Productive Alts., Inc., (applying canon to entire chapter of statutes)).
State v. Patterson 796 N.W.2d 516 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Patterson 796 N.W.2d 516 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
“The [Minnesota sentencing] guidelines provide that [m]ultiple offenses are sentenced in the order in which they occurred.” (alteration in original) (quotation omitted).
Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners v. Cich 788 N.W.2d 515 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners v. Cich 788 N.W.2d 515 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
(applying this canon to the statute authorizing the appointment of public defenders); (applying this canon to the sentencing guidelines); Nelson v. Productive Alts., Inc., , 457 *522 (Minn.2006) (applying this canon to an entire chapter of statutes).
State v. Rivers 787 N.W.2d 206 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Rivers 787 N.W.2d 206 Minn. Ct. App. 2010