Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Williams, 771 N.W.2d 514.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(reviewing de novo whether a sentence conforms to the requirements of a statute).
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(sentence authorized by law); (section 609.04, subdivision 1).
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“A defendant’ s criminal-history score is calculated, in part, by allotting ‘points’ for each of a defendant’s prior convictions for which a felony sentence was imposed.” d 514, 521 (Minn. 2009).
- Samuel David Berg v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-
Samuel David Berg v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
isonment in excess of one year under the law under which the witness was convicted, and the court determines that the probative value of admitting this evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect.” “Evidence of a defendant’s prior felony convictions may be admitted if ‘the court determines that the probative value of admitting this evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect.’” (quoting Minn. R. Evid.
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- Simon Christopher Mueller, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- Brandon Jerome Hanson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- Brandon Jerome Hanson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-
DeMarcus LeMaine Barker, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
1 (2014): “if a person’s conduct constitutes more than one offense under the laws of this state, the person may be punished for only one of the offenses and a conviction or acquittal of any one of them is a bar to prosecution for any other of them.” This statute “prohibits the imposition of multiple sentences for offenses committed as part of a single behavioral incident.”
- Travis Clay Andersen, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- Travis Clay Andersen, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
d 514, 518 (Minn. 2009).
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
S (whether sentence conforms to sentencing guidelines); State v. Scovel , (interpretation of sentencing guidelines).
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“The legislature has the exclusive authority to define crimes and offenses and the range of the sentences or punishments for their violation.” Minn. Stat. § 609.095(a) (2022).
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- Robert Bryant Salley, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
Robert Bryant Salley, Jr. v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Under the Hernandez method of sentencing, if “a defendant is sentenced for multiple offenses on the same day, a conviction for which the defendant is first sentenced is added to his or her criminal-history score for another offense for which he or she is also sentenced.” (allowing a district court to increase a defendant’s criminal-history score when sentencing multiple offenses on the same day if certain conditions are met).
- State of Minnesota v. Michael Adam Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Michael Adam Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Larry Artis Moore, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Larry Artis Moore, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- Andrew Henry Lieberman v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- Andrew Henry Lieberman v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Damarcus Deontay Holloway Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. Damarcus Deontay Holloway
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
5; (listing this and other exceptions to Minn. Stat. § 609.035, subd.
- State of Minnesota v. Rafael Antonio Segura-Arroyo Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Rafael Antonio Segura-Arroyo Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- A23-0163 Jose Armando Padilla v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- A23-0163 Jose Armando Padilla v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Ronald Wayne Taleronik Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State of Minnesota v. Ronald Wayne Taleronik Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State of Minnesota v. Paul Scott Seeman Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-
State of Minnesota v. Paul Scott Seeman
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-22 (Minn. 2009) (explaining the Hernandez method as “when a defendant is sentenced for multiple offenses on the same day, a conviction for which the defendant is first sentenced is added to his or her criminal history score for another offense for which he or she is also sentenced” and stating that the method