Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Bobo, 770 N.W.2d 129.

183 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Gerard McNeal, and Gerard McNeal v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Vang 847 N.W.2d 248 Minn. 2014
State v. Vang 847 N.W.2d 248 Minn. 2014
State v. Ge Her 843 N.W.2d 590 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Ge Her 843 N.W.2d 590 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Hicks 837 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Hicks 837 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Nevertheless, a violation of the Sixth Amendment right to a public trial “is considered a structural error that is not subject to a harmless error analysis.”
State v. Silvernail 831 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 2013
State v. Zornes 831 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 2013
State v. Zornes 831 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 2013
Andersen v. State 830 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2013
Andersen v. State 830 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2013
Bobo v. State 820 N.W.2d 511 Minn. 2012
Bobo v. State 820 N.W.2d 511 Minn. 2012
State v. Grigsby 818 N.W.2d 511 Minn. 2012
State v. Grigsby 818 N.W.2d 511 Minn. 2012
State v. Brown 815 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 2012
State v. Beecroft 813 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 2012
State v. Beecroft 813 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 2012
Sames v. State 805 N.W.2d 565 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Sames v. State 805 N.W.2d 565 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
The “objective standard of reasonableness” is the “ ‘representation by an attorney exercising the customary skills and diligence that a reasonably competent attorney would perform under similar circumstances.’ ” ().
State v. Grigsby 806 N.W.2d 101 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Grigsby 806 N.W.2d 101 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
(stating that questions of constitutional law are reviewed de novo).
State v. Usee 800 N.W.2d 192 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Usee 800 N.W.2d 192 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
at 1365 ; (quoting Crawford).
State v. Infante 796 N.W.2d 349 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Infante 796 N.W.2d 349 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. DALBEC 781 N.W.2d 430 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. DALBEC 781 N.W.2d 430 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
(recognizing trial tactics as purposeful strategy and not subject to review).
State v. Burkland 775 N.W.2d 372 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Burkland 775 N.W.2d 372 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Cross 771 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Cross 771 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
2009 WL 2382560, at *7 (Minn.2009).