DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Welfare of the Children of B.J.B., 747 N.W.2d 605.

26 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: H.M.S. and A.A.C., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C. M. M. and A. J. M., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C. M. M. and A. J. M., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(Minn. 9 A “force majeure” is an unanticipated and uncontrollable event, including an act of nature such as a flood or hurricane, that prevents someone from doing something the person agreed or planned to do.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Mathews v. Eldridge , 424 U.S. 319, 335, 96 S. Ct. 893, 903 (1976)
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: R. H. and D. M., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: B.E.M. and J.M.M., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(“The applicable due -process standard for juvenile proceedings is fundamental fairness.”).
, A18-1830 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. L. H. and K. S. M. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
d 605, 610 (Minn. App. 2008).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: N. J. G. and J. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: G. A. and R. O. C. A., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: G. A. and R. O. C. A., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K. B., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K. B., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. J. S., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. J. S., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
And, “[f]inality is one factor to be considered in determining a child’s best interests.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C.L.T. and J.T., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C.L.T. and J.T., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: E. M. U. and W. H. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: D. A. J., Sr. and C. A., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: E. M. U. and W. H. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Whether a parent’s due process rights have been violated in a termination proceeding is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: D. A. J., Sr. and C. A., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: M. H. and S. R., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: M. H. and S. R., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Whether a parent’s due-process rights have been violated in a termination proceeding is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo.”
In Re the Welfare of the Children of D.F. 752 N.W.2d 88 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In Re the Welfare of the Children of D.F. 752 N.W.2d 88 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
A stay of a TPR order is without “specific authority in statute or rule.” P.R.L., d at 543 ; (discussing P.R.L.