Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Back, 775 N.W.2d 866.

22 citing documents.

Josh Campion, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
But in the standard of review for Ironwood Springs, this court stated that “[w]hether a person has a duty of care is an issue for the court to determine as a matter of law.” d at 197 (emphasis added) (quoting State v. Back , ).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-8 (Minn. 2013) (citing Lubbers for proposition that superseding cause is question of fact and affirming conviction of criminal vehicular homicide); -72 & n.5 (Minn. 2009) (citing Lubbers in discussing elements of duty and proximate cause and reversing conviction of second-degree culpable-negligence manslaughter).
Danna Rochelle Back, Minn. 2023
FACTS The facts and circumstances leading to Back’s conviction for second-degree manslaughter are described in detail in State v. Back (Back I), and are summarized here.
Court of Appeals Hudson, J. Dissenting as to Part I, Anderson, J., David Smits, as Trustee for the … Minn. 2022
In support of this claim, it cites our prior decision in State v. Back, where we held that “there is generally no duty to protect strangers from the criminal actions of a third party.”
Danna Rochelle Back, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State v. Back , WL 910756, at *1 (Minn. App. Apr.
Minn. 2021
by the person’s culpable negligence whereby the person creates an unreasonable risk, and consciously takes chances of causing deat h or great bodily harm to another.’ ” (quoting Minn. Stat. § 609.205 (2020)).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
It is intentional conduct which the actor ma y not intend to be harmful but which an ordinary and reasonably prudent man would recognize as involving a strong probability of injury to others.” State v. Zupetz
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
An appellate court will not disturb a verdict “if the jury, acting with due regard for the presumption of innocence and for the necessity of overcoming it by proof beyond a reasonable doubt, could reasonably conclude that a defendant was proven guilty of the offense charged.” (quotation omitted).
Buhl v. State 922 N.W.2d 435 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Buhl v. State 922 N.W.2d 435 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Back , , 871-72 (Minn. 2009).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Second-degree manslaughter requires culpable negligence, which is “gross negligence coupled with the element of recklessness.” State v. 22 Back, (q uotation omitted).
Back v. State 902 N.W.2d 23 Minn. 2017
Back v. State 902 N.W.2d 23 Minn. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
It is gross negligence coupled with the element of recklessness.” State v. Back , (quotations and citations omitted).
Danna Rochelle Back v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 614 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Danna Rochelle Back v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 614 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State v. McCormick 835 N.W.2d 498 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. McCormick 835 N.W.2d 498 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
at 319 (quotation omitted); , 869 n. 5 (Minn.2009).
Ironwood Springs Christian Ranch, Inc. v. Emmaus 801 N.W.2d 193 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Ironwood Springs Christian Ranch, Inc. v. Emmaus 801 N.W.2d 193 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
“Whether a person has a duty of care is an issue for the court to determine as a matter of law.” (quotation omitted).
State v. Super 781 N.W.2d 390 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Super 781 N.W.2d 390 Minn. Ct. App. 2010