Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Carey v. State, 765 N.W.2d 396.
- State of Minnesota v. Henry Lee Brown Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Henry Lee Brown Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Carey v. State , rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
-
Andrew Audstin Emerson Brown, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Carey v. State , (concluding no manifest injustice where plea included nonchronological sentencing).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Aug.
- State of Minnesota v. Cody John Opheim Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
State of Minnesota v. Cody John Opheim
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Aug.
- State of Minnesota v. Virginia Marie Carlson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
State of Minnesota v. Virginia Marie Carlson
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
We address each argument in turn.1 The voluntary requirement “insures that the guilty plea is not in response to improper pressures or inducements.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Aug.
- Brian Scott Poquette v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
Brian Scott Poquette v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Appellant’s plea was therefore voluntary because the promise of getting his time in prison reduced was fulfilled and he received “exactly what he bargained for.” (concluding that, when defendant agreed to a sentence contrary to sentencing guidelines, he could not prove that his guilty plea was involuntary because he received “exactly what he bargained for”), review denied (Minn. Aug.
- State of Minnesota v. Lester Ray Wiley Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
State of Minnesota v. Lester Ray Wiley
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(reviewing postconviction court’s application of manifest-injustice standard for abuse of discretion), review denied (Minn. Aug.
- State of Minnesota v. Matthew Joseph Knebel Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Joseph Knebel
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
District court and defense counsel The voluntary requirement “insures that the guilty plea is not in response to improper pressures or inducements.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Aug.
- Crystal Marie Vodinelich v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
Crystal Marie Vodinelich v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A defendant seeking to withdraw a guilty plea after sentencing must show “that withdrawal is necessary to correct a ‘manifest injustice.’” (quoting Minn. R. Crim.
- State of Minnesota v. Harry Maddox, III Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
State of Minnesota v. Harry Maddox, III
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(stating that the factual basis requirement “protects a defendant from pleading guilty to an offense more serious than defendant’s conduct warrants”); review denied (Minn. Aug.
- Otis Elliot Woodson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
Otis Elliot Woodson v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A defendant seeking to withdraw a guilty plea after sentencing must show “that withdrawal is necessary to correct a ‘manifest injustice.’” (quoting Minn. R. Crim.
- State of Minnesota v. Jay Michael Ellingson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
State of Minnesota v. Jay Michael Ellingson
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
3 DECISION I. A defendant seeking to withdraw a guilty plea after sentencing must show “that withdrawal is necessary to correct a ‘manifest injustice.’” d 396, 400 (Minn. App. 2009) (quoting Minn. R. Crim.
- State of Minnesota v. Jermale Jermar Kling Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
State of Minnesota v. Jermale Jermar Kling
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Aug.
- State of Minnesota v. Steven Anthoni McMorris-Rice, Appellant./li> Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
State of Minnesota v. Steven Anthoni McMorris-Rice, Appellant./li>
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“The accuracy requirement protects the defendant from pleading guilty to a more serious offense than he or she could be properly convicted of at trial.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Aug.
- David Laurence Hodges v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
David Laurence Hodges v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Aug.