DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Eagan Economic Development Authority v. U-Haul Co. of Minnesota, 787 N.W.2d 523.

44 citing documents.

A Resolution Reaffirming the Issuance of a Cannabis Retail Registration to Jigar Patel, DBA Nature Creation Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. U-Haul Co. of Minn., (resolutions).
In the Matter of the Application of Jason Kitzman and Rani Kitzman for a Conditional Use Permit Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. U-Haul Co. of Minn., (noting that rules of statutory construction apply to ordinances).
Peter K Butler v. City of St. Paul, Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Peter K Butler v. City of St. Paul, Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In re the Estate of Gordon Jaenisch, Deceased, and In re the Estate of MaryAnn Shirley Jaenisch, Deceased Minn. Ct. App. 2025
v. U -Haul Co. of Minnesota
State of Minnesota by Peters Sunset Beach, Inc., et al v. Pope County Minn. Ct. App. 2024
v. U-Haul Co. of Minn., (quotation omitted) .
In re Resolution Denying Stoick Creek, LLC’s Application for a Second Driveway Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re Resolution Denying Stoick Creek, LLC’s Application for a Second Driveway Minn. Ct. App. 2023
v. U-Haul Co., -77 (Minn. App. 2007)
Almir Puce v. City of Burnsville, MN., A21-0895, Supreme Court. September 28, 2023. Minn. 2023
Almir Puce v. City of Burnsville, MN., A21-0895, Supreme Court. September 28, 2023. Minn. 2023
Charlene Y. Latham v. Progressive Preferred Insurance Company, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2021
v. U-Haul Co. of Minn. , (quotation omitted).
A18-2159 A18-2163 In the matter of the reissuance of an NPDES/SDS Minn. 2021
v. U-Haul Co. of Minn ., (quoting Crystal Beach Ba y Ass’n v. County of Koochiching, ); see also United Power Ass’n v. Comm’r of Revenue, n.3 (Minn. 1992) (taking judicial notice of an MPCA permit “as a matter of public record”).
State of Minnesota v. Xavier Alfred Haywood Minn. Ct. App. 2020
v. U–Haul Co. of Minn., (stating that appellate courts have inherent power to take judicial notice of public records where the orderly administration of justice commends it).
State v. Rogers 925 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2019
Thomas A. Ruether, et al v. Kathleen Mimbach Living Trust, et al., City of Rockville Minn. Ct. App. 2018
v. U –Haul Co. of Minn., 5 (Dec.
Maria Vlachou-Hahn, et al v. Michael A. Zimmer, as Special Administrator for the Estate of Marcus Hahn, deceased, … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
v. U-Haul Co. of Minn. , (“[W]e have taken judicial notice of public records and have said we have the inherent power to look beyond the record where the orderly administration of justice commends it.” (quotation omitted)).
In re the Guardianship and Conservatorship of: Helen Vikla, Conservatee Minn. Ct. App. 2018
v. U-Haul Co. of Minn. , (“[W]e have taken judicial notice of public records a nd have said we have the inherent power to look be yond the record where the orde rly administration of justice commends it.” (quotation omitted)).
Minnesota Solar, LLC v. Carver County Board of Commissioners Minn. Ct. App. 2017
v. U-Haul Co. of Minn. , 12 (stating that appellate court may take judicial notice of public records even if they we re not presented in district court because appellate courts “have the inherent power to look beyond th e record where the orderly administration of justice commends it”) (quotation omitted).
A16-1900 A16-1901 A16-1903 A16-1904 A16-1906 A16-1907 City of Fairmont v. Thomas D. Unruh Minn. Ct. App. 2017
v. U-Haul Co. of Minn., Hursh v. Village of Long Lake, 247 Minn. 1, 4, (interpreting a municipal resolution to decide if it conformed to statutory requirements).
In re the Marriage of: Elena Vladimirovna Tokarev v. Vladimir Efimovich Tokarev Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Elena Vladimirovna Tokarev v. Vladimir Efimovich Tokarev Minn. Ct. App. 2017
v. U-Haul Co. of Minn., (quotation omitted); see also Minn. R. Evid.
State of Minnesota v. Renee Anita Vasko 889 N.W.2d 551 Minn. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Renee Anita Vasko 889 N.W.2d 551 Minn. 2017
Boardwalk Bar & Grill, LLC v. East Grand Forks City Council Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Boardwalk Bar & Grill, LLC v. East Grand Forks City Council Minn. Ct. App. 2016
v. U-Haul Co. of Minn., –36 (Minn. 2010).
Susanne M. Glasser v. Butler Liberty Law, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Susanne M. Glasser v. Butler Liberty Law, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
v. U-Haul Co. of Minn., (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota by Lorie Afremov and Michael R. Afremov v. Anne L. Remes, et al., Martha W. … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota by Lorie Afremov and Michael R. Afremov v. Anne L. Remes, et al., Martha W. … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A & M Market LLC v. West Side Groceries, Inc., et al. and third party plaintiffs, vs. Stryker … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A & M Market LLC v. West Side Groceries, Inc., et al. and third party plaintiffs, vs. Stryker … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
v. U-Haul Co. of Minn., d 523, 530 (Minn. 2010) (taking judicial notice of public records).
Whitefish Area Property Owners Association, et al v. Crow Wing County Board of Commissioners, Minnesota-Iowa Baptist Conference Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Whitefish Area Property Owners Association, et al v. Crow Wing County Board of Commissioners, Minnesota-Iowa Baptist Conference Minn. Ct. App. 2015
d 523, 535 (Minn. 2010) (stating that rules of statutory construction apply to ordinances).
Lonn H. Luhman v. Red Wing Shoe Co., Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Lonn H. Luhman v. Red Wing Shoe Co., Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jeffery R. Schultz v. Scott A. Mende, et al. and third party plaintiffs, vs. City of Madison Lake, … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Jeffery R. Schultz v. Scott A. Mende, et al. and third party plaintiffs, vs. City of Madison Lake, … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Daniel Garcia-Mendoza v. 2003 Chevy Tahoe, Vin 1GNEC13V23R143453, Plate 235JBM 852 N.W.2d 659 Minn. 2014
Daniel Garcia-Mendoza v. 2003 Chevy Tahoe, Vin 1GNEC13V23R143453, Plate 235JBM 852 N.W.2d 659 Minn. 2014
v. U-Haul Co. of Minn., 17 (“[W]e reverse and remand to the court of appeals to consider the property owners’ other claims.”); (“The court of appeals did not address these arguments .
Martin v. State 825 N.W.2d 734 Minn. 2013
In re Guardianship of DeYoung 801 N.W.2d 211 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
In re Guardianship of DeYoung 801 N.W.2d 211 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Taylor v. LSI Corp. of America 796 N.W.2d 153 Minn. 2011
Taylor v. LSI Corp. of America 796 N.W.2d 153 Minn. 2011