Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Riddley, 776 N.W.2d 419.

114 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Fonati McArthur Diggs Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(“[T]he rule excluding evidence of the commission of other offenses does not necessarily deprive the state of the right to make out its whole case against the accused on any evidence which is otherwise relevant upon the issue of the defendant’s guilt of the crime with which he was charged.”) (quo
State of Minnesota v. Patrick William Benton 858 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Patrick William Benton 858 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 2015
(alteration in original) (citations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Timothy Denzel Cross Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Timothy Denzel Cross Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Ernest Henry Chouinard Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Ernest Henry Chouinard Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(explaining immediate-episode evidence).
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Cortez Gray Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Cortez Gray Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(citing Bowers and rejecting the necessity of a Batson challenge to a for-cause dismissal).
State v. Brown 815 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 2012
State v. Hormann 805 N.W.2d 883 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Hormann 805 N.W.2d 883 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
*889 “Immediate-episode evidence is a narrow exception to the general character evidence rule.”
State v. Hill 801 N.W.2d 646 Minn. 2011
State v. Hill 801 N.W.2d 646 Minn. 2011
(explaining that a cautionary instruction by the district court is relevant to an assessment of whether an evidentiary error was harmless).