Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Citizens for Rule of Law v. Senate Committee on Rules & Administration, 770 N.W.2d 169.

24 citing documents.

In RE: The Matter of the Irrevocable Trust of Myron E. Childs, dated November 2, 2000 Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In RE: The Matter of the Irrevocable Trust of Myron E. Childs, dated November 2, 2000 Minn. Ct. App. 2026
on Rules & Admin., (quotation omitted).
Farhan Badel, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
on Rules & Admin., rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
n.1 (Minn. App. 2009) , rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
Justin Thomas Skyberg, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
on Rules & Admin., rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
Deborah Jane Clapp v. Rochelle Cox, in her official capacity as Interim Superintendent of Minneapolis ... Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Deborah Jane Clapp v. Rochelle Cox, in her official capacity as Interim Superintendent of Minneapolis ... Minn. Ct. App. 2023
on Rules & Admin., (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
Thomas Anthony Greshowak, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
on Rules & Admin., (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
Lisa Stone, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
on Rules & Admin., (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
St. Cloud Educational Rights Advocacy Council, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
on Rules & Admin ., d 169, 173 (Minn. App. 2009), review denied (Minn. Oct.
Distinguished Dr. Jane Doe, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Oct.
Jennifer Schroeder, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
on Rules & Admin., review denied (Minn. Oct.
Irv’s Boomin’ Fireworks, LLC, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
on Rules & Admin., review denied (Minn. Oct.
Cleveland-Cliffs Minnesota Land Development, LLC, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
on Rules & Admin., (“[T]he doctrine requires a comparison between the relief demanded and the circumstances of the case at the time of dec ision in order to determine whether there is a live controversy that can be resolved.” (quotation omitted)), review denied (Minn. Oct.
In re the Matter of: Angel A. Fernandez v. Cindy Marbella Anariba Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Matter of: Angel A. Fernandez v. Cindy Marbella Anariba Minn. Ct. App. 2017
on Rules & Admin., (“[T]he doctrine requires a comparison between the relief demanded and the circumstances of the case at the time of decision in order to determine whether there is a live controversy that can be resolved.“ (quotation omitted)), review denied (Minn. Oct.
DRB 24, LLC, on behalf of itself and other similarly situated property owners in Minneapolis that have been … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
DRB 24, LLC, on behalf of itself and other similarly situated property owners in Minneapolis that have been … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
on Rules & Admin., review denied (Minn. Oct.
Angela K. Schreader v. DC & D Enterprises, LLC, d/b/a Above Summit Construction Services Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Angela K. Schreader v. DC & D Enterprises, LLC, d/b/a Above Summit Construction Services Minn. Ct. App. 2016
see Minn. Const. art. IV, § 9 (“The compensation of senators and representatives shall be prescribed by law.
McCullough and Sons, Inc. v. City of Vadnais Heights 868 N.W.2d 721 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
McCullough and Sons, Inc. v. City of Vadnais Heights 868 N.W.2d 721 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Subject-matter jurisdiction is best understood as the power to hear particular classes of cases.” Citizens for Rule of Law v. Senate Committee on Rules & Admin., review denied (Minn. Oct.
Christopher v. Windom Area School Board 781 N.W.2d 904 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Christopher v. Windom Area School Board 781 N.W.2d 904 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Citizens for Rule of Law v. Senate Comm, on Rules & Admin., (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Oct.