Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bahr v. CAPELLA UNIVERSITY, 788 N.W.2d 76.

123 citing documents.

In Re: the Petition of K. S. O. and M. A. O. to Adopt L. R. O. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Such a dismissal is warranted if “it appears to a certainty that no facts, which could be introduced consistent with the pleading, exist which would support granting the relief demanded.” (discussing dismissal under Minn. R. Civ.
State of Minnesota, by its Attorney General, Lori Swanson and its Commissioner of Commerce, Michael Rothman v. CashCall, … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota, by its Attorney General, Lori Swanson and its Commissioner of Commerce, Michael Rothman v. CashCall, … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Laura L. Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A. 851 N.W.2d 598 Minn. 2014
Laura L. Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A. 851 N.W.2d 598 Minn. 2014
Marcia Lee Stresemann, d/b/a Affiliated Counseling Center, LLC v. Lucinda Jesson, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Marcia Lee Stresemann, d/b/a Affiliated Counseling Center, LLC v. Lucinda Jesson, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Manjit I. Bajwa v. Timothy Bailey, Minnesota Lawyers Mutual (MLM) Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Manjit I. Bajwa v. Timothy Bailey, Minnesota Lawyers Mutual (MLM) Minn. Ct. App. 2014
P. 12.02(e) “if it appears to a certainty that no facts, which could be introduced consistent with the pleading, exist which would support granting the relief demanded.” (quotation omitted).
Capital Midwest Fund, LP v. Douglas E. Johnson, Steven Quay Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Capital Midwest Fund, LP v. Douglas E. Johnson, Steven Quay Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“We have said that a pleading will be dismissed only if it appears to a certainty that no facts, which could be introduced consistent with the pleading, exist which would support granting the relief demanded.” (quotation omitted).
Graphic Communications Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund "A", Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. CVS Caremark Corporation, Appellants/Cross-Respondents, Coborn's Incorporated, Appellant/Cross-Respondent, … 850 N.W.2d 682 Minn. 2014
Graphic Communications Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund "A", Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. CVS Caremark Corporation, Appellants/Cross-Respondents, Coborn's Incorporated, Appellant/Cross-Respondent, … 850 N.W.2d 682 Minn. 2014
A claim is sufficient to survive a motion to dismiss “if it is possible on any evidence which might be 16 produced, consistent with the pleader’s theory, to grant the relief demanded.” N. States Power Co. v. Franklin, 265 Minn. 391, 395
Finn v. Alliance Bank 838 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Finn v. Alliance Bank 838 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
(summary judgment); (rule 12.02(e) dismissal).
Brenny v. Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota 813 N.W.2d 417 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Brenny v. Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota 813 N.W.2d 417 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Dismissal is permitted under rule 12.02, “only if it appears to a certainty that no facts, which could be introduced consistent with the pleading, exist which would support granting the relief demanded.” (quotation omitted).
Columbia Casualty Co. v. 3M Co. 814 N.W.2d 33 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Columbia Casualty Co. v. 3M Co. 814 N.W.2d 33 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Marriage of Choa Yang Xiong v. Su Xiong 800 N.W.2d 187 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Marriage of Choa Yang Xiong v. Su Xiong 800 N.W.2d 187 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Coursolle v. EMC Insurance Group, Inc. 794 N.W.2d 652 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Coursolle v. EMC Insurance Group, Inc. 794 N.W.2d 652 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
15(1) (2010); (interpreting section 363A.15 and citing 42 U.S.C.