DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Scherf v. State, 788 N.W.2d 504.

22 citing documents.

  • , A22-0290 Minn. 2023
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
  • Minn. 2020
    In making this determination, we revi ew a district court’s factual determinations for clear error, and review the district court’s legal conclusions de novo, Leake v. State
  • Justin Michael Fenney, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    However, “[a]n eviden tiary hearing is unnecessary if the substance of the affidavit purporting to contain newly discovered evidence, when taken at face value, is insufficient to entitle the petitione r to the relief requested.” Scherf v. State
  • Peter Louis John, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
    Factual “findings are reviewed to determine whether there is sufficient evidentiary support in the record.”
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
    The district court did not hold an evidentiary hearing, which “is unnecessary if the substance of the affidavit purporting to contain newly discovered evidence, when taken at face value, is insufficient to entitle the petitioner to the relief requested.”
  • Jacob Stephen Brown v. State of Minnesota 863 N.W.2d 781 Minn. 2015
  • Jacob Stephen Brown v. State of Minnesota 863 N.W.2d 781 Minn. 2015
    The postconviction court need not hold an evidentiary hearing “if the substance of the affidavit purporting to contain newly discovered evidence, when taken at face value, is insufficient to entitle the petitioner to the relief requested.”
  • State v. Vang 847 N.W.2d 248 Minn. 2014
  • State v. Vang 847 N.W.2d 248 Minn. 2014
  • Wells v. State 839 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
  • Wells v. State 839 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
  • Torres v. State 837 N.W.2d 487 Minn. 2013
  • Torres v. State 837 N.W.2d 487 Minn. 2013
  • Andersen v. State 830 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2013
  • Andersen v. State 830 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2013
    But “[a]n evidentiary hearing is unnecessary if the substance of the' affidavit purporting to contain newly discovered evidence, when taken at face value, is insufficient to entitle the petitioner to the relief requested.”
  • Riley v. State 819 N.W.2d 162 Minn. 2012
  • Riley v. State 819 N.W.2d 162 Minn. 2012
  • State v. Caldwell 803 N.W.2d 373 Minn. 2011
  • State v. Caldwell 803 N.W.2d 373 Minn. 2011
    508 -509 (Minn.2010) (“Scherf admittedly knew the witness existed at the time of trial and knew the substance of what the witness would have testified to....
  • State v. Hawes 801 N.W.2d 659 Minn. 2011
  • State v. Hawes 801 N.W.2d 659 Minn. 2011
    (“explaining that ‘the statement of an individual who refused to testify at trial is not “unknown” ...