A08-1822 Precedential Affirmed Processed

NORGREN v. Aramark

Minnesota Supreme Court · Filed January 28, 2009 · 759 N.W.2d 892

Cited by

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Michelle Lowney MacDonald, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration Minn. 2021
Original Jurisdiction Per Curiam Minn. 2021
In Re Petition for Reinstatement of Clark Calvin GRIFFITH, II, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration … 883 N.W.2d 798 Minn. 2016
In re Disciplinary Action Against Montez 812 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 2012
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Aitken 787 N.W.2d 152 Minn. 2010
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Roggeman 779 N.W.2d 520 Minn. 2010

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

Hoff v. Kempton 317 N.W.2d 361

Opinion text

ORDER Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 24, 2008, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case). BY THE COURT: /s/Alan C. Page Associate Justice