Cited by

A nonparty may consent to a forum-selection clause when it is “closely related to the dispute such that it becomes foreseeable that it will be bound.” C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. FLS Transp., Inc.

In C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. FLS Transportation, Inc., rev. denied (Minn. Nov.

“Once a defendant challenges personal jurisdiction, the burden of proof is on the plaintiff to show the jurisdiction exists.” C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. FLS Transp., Inc., rev. denied (Minn. Nov.

“The first three factors carry the most weight in the court’s overall personal-jurisdiction determination.” C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. FLS Transp., Inc., rev. denied (Minn. Nov.

Appraisal Assocs., Inc., d 88, 89, 91 (Minn. 1991), and C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. FLS Transp., Inc., 538–39 (Minn. App. 2009), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.

“Once a defendant challenges personal jurisdiction, the burden of proof is on the plaintiff to show the jurisdiction exists.” C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. FLS Transp., Inc.

See Dent- Air, d at 908 (recognizing Minnesota’s “interest in providing a forum for its residents who have allegedly been wronged”); C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. FLS Transp., Inc., (concluding that when a case involves an alleged injury to a Minnesota resident, both the resident and Minnesota have an interest in resolving the dispute here), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.

See Dent-Air, d at 908 (recognizing Minnesota has an “interest in providing a forum for its residents who have allegedly been wronged” ); C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. FLS Transp., Inc., (reasoning that when a case involves an alleged injury to a Minnesota resident, both the resident and Minnesota have an interest in resolving the dispute here) , rev. denied (Minn. Nov.

(quoting C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. FLS Transp., Inc., ).

C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. FLS Transp., Inc., rev. denied (Minn. Nov.

“When multiple parties are named as defendants, personal jurisdiction must be established for each defendant.” C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. FLS Transp., Inc., rev. denied (Minn. Nov.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. FLS Transp., Inc ., review denied (Minn. Nov.

10 to the level of a due process violation.” C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. FLS Transp., Inc., -39 (Minn. App. 2009) (quotation omitted).

C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. FLS Transp., Inc., (citation omitted).

“The mere continuation of employment can 6 constitute adequate compensation to uphold non-compete agreements, but the non- compete [agreement] must be bargained for and provide the employee with real advantages.” C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. FLS Transp., Inc.

UNPUBLISHED OPINION REYES, Judge Appellant argues that the district court cannot subject it to personal jurisdiction under the “closely related” doctrine applied in C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. FLS Transp., Inc.

Compare Arkansas Rice Growers, 797 F.2d at 573 with C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. FLS Transp., Inc., (exercising jurisdiction over 7 out-of-state employees based solely on contacts that occurred through their employment), review denied (Minn. Nov.

But the presumption is not determinative because it “may be rebutted if the defendants can show that public and private interest factors favor another forum.” C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. FLS Transp., Inc., (citing Bergquist v. Medtronic, Inc., ).

see also C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. FLS Transp., Inc.