Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite J.E.B. v. Danks, 785 N.W.2d 741.

49 citing documents.

Thomas Brule Trucking, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v Danks, (stating that appellate courts must not view a single piece of evidence in isolation when determining whether there is a genuine issue of material fact).
Brenda Thormodson v. Kathryn Rae Zehnder Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Brenda Thormodson v. Kathryn Rae Zehnder Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Jacob Pries, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Lorob Properties LLC, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Judith Rygwall, as Trustee for the Heirs and Next of Kin of Amy Rygwall v. ACR Homes, Inc. … 6 N.W.3d 416 Minn. 2024
Judith Rygwall, as Trustee for the Heirs and Next of Kin of Amy Rygwall v. ACR Homes, Inc. … 6 N.W.3d 416 Minn. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Allen Borgquist 7 N.W.3d 145 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Allen Borgquist 7 N.W.3d 145 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
v. Danks, and Good Faith, Black’s Law Dictionary (9th ed. 2009)).
Alejandro Cruz-Guzman, as guardian and next friend of his minor children v. State of Minnesota, ... Minn. 2023
Alejandro Cruz-Guzman, as guardian and next friend of his minor children v. State of Minnesota, ... Minn. 2023
v Danks, (addressing an alternative issue specifically “to provide guidance on remand”).
Lighthouse Management Inc., Plaintiff, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Stephanie Joy Krishnan, f/k/a Beuning, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
v. Danks, (addressing certain matters “to provid e guidance on remand”); In re Estate of Vittorio , d 751, 756 (Minn. App. 1996) (addressing a question “in the in terest of judicial economy” “[b]ecause this issue will arise on remand”).
In Re the Custody of: S.K.T.S: Sharon D. Oglesby, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
v Danks, (addressing certain matters “to provide guidance on remand”); (addressing a question “in the interest of judicial economy” “[b]ecause this issue will arise on remand”).
A19-0714 Minn. 2020
v. Danks, (first alteration in original) (quoting Good Faith, Black’s Law Dictionary (9th ed. 2009) ).
Cynthia Padilla, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
v. Danks, , 749 (Minn. 2010) (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary 762 (9th ed. 2009) ).
Samuel Zean, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Edwards Lifesciences, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Buskey v. Am. Legion Post 910 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 2018
Buskey v. Am. Legion Post 910 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 2018
v. Danks , , 746 (Minn. 2010) (noting that "[o]n appeal [from summary judgment], we must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom judgment was granted" (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted)); Sauter v. Sauter , 244 Minn. 482 , , 353 (1955) ("[A]ll factual inferences *2
Loren J. Zutz, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
v. Danks, n.4 (Minn. 2010) (reversing defendant’s statutory fee award due to reversal of grant of summary judgment).
Jackson ex rel. Sorenson v. Options Residential, Inc. 896 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Jackson ex rel. Sorenson v. Options Residential, Inc. 896 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Bethany Good, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Mobile Diagnostic Imaging, Inc. v. Racheal L. Hooten f/k/a Racheal L. Jones 889 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Mobile Diagnostic Imaging, Inc. v. Racheal L. Hooten f/k/a Racheal L. Jones 889 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
v. Danks, (discussing immunity under Minn. Stat. § 626.556, subd.
Jerry Expose, Jr. v. Thad Wilderson & Associates, P.A., Nina Mattson 889 N.W.2d 279 Minn. 2016
Jerry Expose, Jr. v. Thad Wilderson & Associates, P.A., Nina Mattson 889 N.W.2d 279 Minn. 2016
First Baptist Church of St. Paul v. City of St. Paul 884 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 2016
First Baptist Church of St. Paul v. City of St. Paul 884 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 2016
Justin K. Ayers v. John William Kalal Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Justin K. Ayers v. John William Kalal Minn. Ct. App. 2015
v. Danks, 3 Appellants assert in their brief that “the evidence shows that it was indeed snowing at the time of the accident[,]” while respondents quote an eyewitness’s testimony that “it did not start snowing until after the collision” and the road was “wet but very clear .
Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of Rochester, First Transit, Inc. 868 N.W.2d 655 Minn. 2015
Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of Rochester, First Transit, Inc. 868 N.W.2d 655 Minn. 2015
Cody Devereaux Sleiter v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company 868 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 2015
Cody Devereaux Sleiter v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company 868 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 2015
T & R Flooring, LLC v. Beverly J. O'Byrne, Eastwood Bank, Mac's Plumbing Service, Inc., Johnson Comfort Systems, … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
T & R Flooring, LLC v. Beverly J. O'Byrne, Eastwood Bank, Mac's Plumbing Service, Inc., Johnson Comfort Systems, … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Medical Staff of Avera Marshall Regional Medical Center on its Own behalf and in its Representative Capacity for … 857 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 2014
Medical Staff of Avera Marshall Regional Medical Center on its Own behalf and in its Representative Capacity for … 857 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 2014
v. Danks, 1 I. This appeal presents two primary issues: (1) whether the Medical Staff has the legal capacity to sue; and (2) whether the medical staff bylaws constitute a contract between Avera Marshall and the Medical Staff.
City of Duluth v. Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa 843 N.W.2d 577 Minn. 2014
City of Duluth v. Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa 843 N.W.2d 577 Minn. 2014
Eischen v. Crystal Valley Cooperative 835 N.W.2d 629 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Eischen v. Crystal Valley Cooperative 835 N.W.2d 629 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
v. Danks, (“[W]e must resolve conflicting inferences in favor of appellants on this appeal from summary judgment.”); (concluding that plaintiff did not assume risk of falling from tree that he ascended to remove tree limb when fall resulted from defenda
Anderson v. Christopherson 816 N.W.2d 626 Minn. 2012
Anderson v. Christopherson 816 N.W.2d 626 Minn. 2012
v. Danks, (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
In re the Welfare of R.S. 805 N.W.2d 44 Minn. 2011
Remodeling Dimensions, Inc. v. Integrity Mutual Insurnce Co. 806 N.W.2d 82 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Remodeling Dimensions, Inc. v. Integrity Mutual Insurnce Co. 806 N.W.2d 82 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
v. Danks, , 751 n. 4 (Minn.2010) (declining to consider alternative grounds for summary judgment that district court had not yet decided).