Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Miller v. Lankow, 801 N.W.2d 120.

29 citing documents.

Snowman Construction v. Ceresota Funding II LLC, et al., Minnwest Bank Minn. Ct. App. 2026
d 120, 128 (Minn. 2011).
State of Minnesota Office of the Attorney General Minn. 2026
State of Minnesota Office of the Attorney General Minn. 2026
–28 (Minn. 2011) (“The duty to preserve evidence exists not only after the formal commencement of litigation, but whenever a party knows or should know that litigation is reasonably foreseeable.” (footnote omitted)).
Daniel W Crandall, et al v. James E Hanson Minn. Ct. App. 2025
As such, the Crandalls did not satisfy the notice requirement in Miller [v. Lankow, ] and have spoliated evidence.
Angeleah Joy Brandt v. Garrett James Brandt, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“A party challenging the district court’s choice of a sanction has the difficult burden of convincing an appellate court that the district court abused its discretion.” Miller v. Lankow
Star Bank v. Robert W Anderson, et al., Bushmills Ethanol, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“A party challenging the district court’s choice of a sanction has the difficult burden of convincing an appellate court that the district court abused its discretion.”
Craig Stevenson, et al v. Sean Stevenson, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Richard Langree, Charles Michael Hopper v. Sarah Jane Keaveny Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Margaret A. Flolid Trust Agreement Dated December 12, 1994 Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Mark D. Island, et al v. Jason D. Ferguson, Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Co. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Miller v. Lankow , -28 (Minn. 2011).
Gary Gruett v. Victoria Labriola, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In the Matter of: Fatoumata Binta Diallo v. Omaru Jalloh Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Karen Mattinen v. Linda Kari, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Miller v. Lankow , (explaining that spoliation of evidence is the “failure to preserve property for another’s use as evidence in pending or future litigation” (quotation omitted)).
Thumper Pond Resort, LLC d/b/a Thumper Pond Resort v. Stock Building Supply Midwest, LLC, et al., Kaashagen & … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Miller v. Lankow , -28 (Minn. 2011).
A18-1406 Scott Kowalewski v. BNSF Railway Company Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“We review a district court’s decision to impose spoliation sanctions for abuse of discretion.”
Teresa Thompson v. Les Riess, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2019
K&S Heating, Air Conditioning & Plumbing, LLC v. Jeremiah J. Kramer a/k/a Jeremy Kramer, XYZ Corporation, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Curtis Trude, (A15-0378), (A15-1863, A15-1864), Glenwood State Bank, counterclaimant, and third party v. Peterson Earth Movers, Inc., Third … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Curtis Trude, (A15-0378), (A15-1863, A15-1864), Glenwood State Bank, counterclaimant, and third party v. Peterson Earth Movers, Inc., Third … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Negassi H. Ghebrehiwet v. Khaled Ghneim, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Negassi H. Ghebrehiwet v. Khaled Ghneim, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“A district court abuses its discretion when it bases its conclusions on an erroneous view of the law.” d 120, 127 (Minn. 2011).
Sandra Williams, et al v. Canterbury Inn Shakopee, LLC, d/b/a Americas Best Value Inn & Suites, d/b/a Arizonas … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Sandra Williams, et al v. Canterbury Inn Shakopee, LLC, d/b/a Americas Best Value Inn & Suites, d/b/a Arizonas … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
R. Wynn Kearney, Jr., M.D. v. The Orthopaedic and Fracture Clinic, P.A., vs. Steven B. Curtis, et al, … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
R. Wynn Kearney, Jr., M.D. v. The Orthopaedic and Fracture Clinic, P.A., vs. Steven B. Curtis, et al, … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“A district court abuses its discretion when it bases its conclusions on an erroneous view of the law.”
State of Minnesota v. Tarah Louise Fichtner 867 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Tarah Louise Fichtner 867 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“A district court abuses its discretion when it bases its conclusions on an erroneous view of the law.”
TC/American Monorail, Inc. v. Custom Conveyor Corp. 840 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 2013
TC/American Monorail, Inc. v. Custom Conveyor Corp. 840 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 2013
v. Minn. Dep't of Human Servs., , 821 n. 3 (Minn.2013)