DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Disciplinary Action Against Rebeau, 787 N.W.2d 168.

133 citing documents.

In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Michael John RIEHM, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0296570 883 N.W.2d 223 Minn. 2016
16 The purpose of attorney discipline “is not to punish the attorney but rather to protect the public, to protect the judicial system, and to deter future misconduct by the disciplined attorney as well as by other attorneys.”
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Paul Roland RAMBOW, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0169389 874 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 2016
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Paul Roland RAMBOW, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0169389 874 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 2016
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Christopher Robert WALSH, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 199813 872 N.W.2d 741 Minn. 2015
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Christopher Robert WALSH, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 199813 872 N.W.2d 741 Minn. 2015
The purpose of disciplinary sanctions “for professional misconduct is not to punish the attorney but rather to protect the public, to protect the judicial system, and to deter future misconduct by the disciplined attorney as well as by other attorneys.” 5 “In the course of representing a client, a lawyer shall not knowingly make a false statement of fact or law.” Minn. R. Prof.
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Jeffrey H. OLSON, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0082004 872 N.W.2d 862 Minn. 2015
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Jeffrey H. OLSON, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0082004 872 N.W.2d 862 Minn. 2015
("The purpose of disciplinary sanctions is 'not to punish the attorney but rather to protect the public, to protect the judicial system, and to deter future misconduct by the disciplined attorney as well as by other attorneys.'" ().
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Marc G. KURZMAN, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 59080 871 N.W.2d 753 Minn. 2015
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Marc G. KURZMAN, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 59080 871 N.W.2d 753 Minn. 2015
The purpose of disciplinary sanctions for professional misconduct is “not to punish the attorney but rather to protect the public, to protect the judicial system, and to deter future misconduct by the disciplined attorney as well as by other attorneys.”
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Lynne A. TORGERSON, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 208322 870 N.W.2d 602 Minn. 2015
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Lynne A. TORGERSON, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 208322 870 N.W.2d 602 Minn. 2015
Although we have said that prior disciplinary history may be an aggravating factor, an attorney’s lack of disciplinary history is not a mitigating factor
In Re PETITION FOR DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Frank Arend SCHULTE, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 244934 869 N.W.2d 674 Minn. 2015
In Re PETITION FOR DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Frank Arend SCHULTE, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 244934 869 N.W.2d 674 Minn. 2015
The purpose of disciplinary sanctions is “not to punish the attorney but rather to protect the public, to protect the judicial system, and to deter future misconduct by the disciplined attorney as well as by other attorneys.”
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Todd Allen DUCKSON, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 219125 868 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 2015
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Todd Allen DUCKSON, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 219125 868 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 2015
In RE Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST William Bernard BUTLER, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 227912 868 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 2015
In RE Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST William Bernard BUTLER, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 227912 868 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 2015
We impose discipline for professional misconduct “not to punish the attorney but rather to protect the public, to protect the judicial system, and to deter future misconduct by the disciplined attorney as well as by other attorneys.”
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Dale Allen HANSEN, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 217840 868 N.W.2d 55 Minn. 2015
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Dale Allen HANSEN, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 217840 868 N.W.2d 55 Minn. 2015
Ultimately, however, we determine the proper discipline “based on the unique facts and circumstances of each case.”
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST David A. OVERBOE, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 83318 867 N.W.2d 482 Minn. 2015
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST David A. OVERBOE, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 83318 867 N.W.2d 482 Minn. 2015
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Scott SELMER, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 156024 866 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 2015
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Scott SELMER, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 156024 866 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 2015
(“The lack of remorse also constitutes an aggravating circumstance.”).
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Mpatanishi Syanaloli TAYARI-GARRETT, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 342075 866 N.W.2d 513 Minn. 2015
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Mpatanishi Syanaloli TAYARI-GARRETT, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 342075 866 N.W.2d 513 Minn. 2015
“[W]e place great weight on the referee’s recommended discipline,” but “we retain ultimate responsibility for determining the appropriate sanction.”
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Duane A. KENNEDY, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 55128 864 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 2015
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Duane A. KENNEDY, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 55128 864 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 2015
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST William L. FRENCH, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 131945 864 N.W.2d 183 Minn. 2015
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST William L. FRENCH, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 131945 864 N.W.2d 183 Minn. 2015
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Herbert Azubuike IGBANUGO, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 191139 863 N.W.2d 751 Minn. 2015
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Herbert Azubuike IGBANUGO, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 191139 863 N.W.2d 751 Minn. 2015
The purpose of disciplinary sanctions for professional misconduct is “not to punish the attorney but rather to protect the public, to protect the judicial system, and to deter future misconduct by the disciplined attorney as well as by other attorneys.”
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Mark Alan GREENMAN, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 228990 860 N.W.2d 368 Minn. 2015
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Brian James ENGEL, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 299790 859 N.W.2d 788 Minn. 2015
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Mark Alan GREENMAN, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 228990 860 N.W.2d 368 Minn. 2015
The purpose of disciplinary sanctions is “not to punish the attorney but rather to protect the public, to protect the judicial system, and to deter future misconduct by the disciplined attorney as well as by other attorneys.”
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Brian James ENGEL, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 299790 859 N.W.2d 788 Minn. 2015
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Larry S. SEVERSON, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 99363 860 N.W.2d 658 Minn. 2015
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Larry S. SEVERSON, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 99363 860 N.W.2d 658 Minn. 2015
In re Petition for Review of Panel Decision against Panel Case No. 35104. 851 N.W.2d 620 Minn. 2014
In re Petition for Review of Panel Decision against Panel Case No. 35104. 851 N.W.2d 620 Minn. 2014
See, (stating that “[e]ven where no single act of misconduct standing alone warrants severe public discipline, the cumulative weight and severity of multiple disciplinary rule violations may compel such discipline”)
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Linda A. BROST, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 182692 850 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 2014
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Linda A. BROST, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 182692 850 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 2014
The purpose of discipline for professional misconduct is “not to punish the attorney but rather to protect the public, to protect the judicial system, and to deter future misconduct by the disciplined attorney as well as by other attorneys.”
In re Disciplinary Action Against Harrigan 841 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 2014
In re Disciplinary Action Against Harrigan 841 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 2014
In re Disciplinary Action against Nett 839 N.W.2d 716 Minn. 2013
In re Disciplinary Action against Nett 839 N.W.2d 716 Minn. 2013
The purpose of disciplinary sanctions for professional misconduct is “not to punish the attorney but rather to protect the public, to protect the judicial system, and to deter future misconduct by the disciplined attorney as well as by other attorneys.”
In re Disciplinary Action Against Hummel 839 N.W.2d 78 Minn. 2013
In re Disciplinary Action Against Hummel 839 N.W.2d 78 Minn. 2013
The purpose of disciplinary sanctions is “to protect the public, to protect the judicial system, and to deter future misconduct by the disciplined attorney as well as by other attorneys.”
In re Disciplinary Action Against Jaeger 834 N.W.2d 705 Minn. 2013
In re Disciplinary Action Against Jones 834 N.W.2d 671 Minn. 2013
In re Disciplinary Action Against Ulanowski 834 N.W.2d 697 Minn. 2013