Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Disciplinary Action Against Rebeau, 787 N.W.2d 168.
-
In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Herbert A. Igbanugo, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0191139. ...
Minn. 2026
The purpose of professional discipline “is not to punish the attorney but rather to protect the public, to protect the judicial system, and to deter future misconduct by the disciplined attorney as well as by other attorneys.”
- In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Ana L. Pena, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0386459 Minn. 2025
-
In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Ana L. Pena, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0386459
Minn. 2025
“The purpose of discipline for professional misconduct is not to punish the attorney but rather to protect the public, to protect the judicial system, and to deter future misconduct by the disciplined attorney as well as by other attorneys.” ().
- In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Kristi D. McNeilly, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0341265. ... Minn. 2025
-
In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Kristi D. McNeilly, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0341265. ...
Minn. 2025
The parties did not, 7 The purpose of professional discipline “is not to punish the attorney but rather to protect the public, to protect the judicial system, and to deter future misconduct by the disciplined attorney as well as by other attorneys.”
- In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Michael B. Padden, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0177519. ... Minn. 2024
-
In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Michael B. Padden, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0177519. ...
Minn. 2024
The purpose of professional discipline “is not to punish the attorney but rather to protect the public, to protect the judicial system, and to deter future misconduct by the disciplined attorney as well as by other attorneys.”
- In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against James V. Bradley, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0392102. ... 7 N.W.3d 604 Minn. 2024
-
In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against James V. Bradley, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0392102. ...
7 N.W.3d 604
Minn. 2024
The purpose of attorney discipline “is not to punish the attorney but rather to protect the public, to protect the judicial system, and to deter future misconduct by the disciplined attorney as well as by other attorneys.”
- In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Fong E. Lee, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0387546 Minn. 2024
-
In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Fong E. Lee, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0387546
Minn. 2024
The purpose of professional discipline “is not to punish the attorney but rather to protect the public, to protect the judicial system, and to deter future misconduct by the disciplined attorney as well as by other attorneys.”
-
Original Jurisdiction Per Curiam
Minn. 2023
Although we may consider similar cases to impose consistent discipline, we determine the proper discipline on a case-by-case basis after examining the “unique facts and circumstances of each case .”
- Original Jurisdiction Per Curiam Minn. 2022
-
Original Jurisdiction Per Curiam
Minn. 2022
We will consult similar cases and attempt to impose consistent discipline, but the proper discipline is ultimately determined “based on the unique facts and circumstances of each case.” In re Rebeau
-
Original Jurisdiction Per Curiam
Minn. 2022
The purpose of imposing discipline “is not to punish the attorney but rather to protect the public, to protect the judicial system, and to deter future misconduct by the disciplined attorney as well as by other attorneys.”
- Original Jurisdiction Per Curiam Minn. 2021
-
Original Jurisdiction Per Curiam
Minn. 2021
“The purpose of discipline for professional misconduct is not to punish the attorney but rather to protect the public, to protect the judicial system, and to deter future misconduct by the disciplined attorney as well as by other attorneys.”
- In re Petition for Reinstatement of Richard A. Sand, Minn. 2020
-
In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Richard Edward Bosse, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0245501.
Minn. 2020
The purpose of attorney discipline “is not to punish the attorney but rather to protect the public, to protect the judicial system, and to deter future misconduct by the disciplined attorney as well as by other attorneys.”
-
Original Jurisdiction Per Curiam
Minn. 2020
We have imposed more severe sanctions on attorneys with a history of disciplinary action “ to send a clear message that such repeated misconduct will not be tolerated.” Albrecht, d at 542; (indefinitely suspending an attorney for a 20 minimum of 12 months because the attorney had “ committed serious misconduct during 10 of his 31 years in practice” and that it was “not a single misstep[,] .
- Origina l Jurisd ict io n Per Curiam Minn. 2020
-
Original Jurisdiction Per Curiam
Minn. 2020
The purpose of discip lining an attorney for professional misconduct is “not to punish the attorney but rather to protect the public, to protect the judicial system, and to deter future misconduct by the disciplined attorney as well as by other attorneys.”
- In re Disciplinary Action Against Sea 932 N.W.2d 28 Minn. 2019
-
In re Disciplinary Action Against Sea
932 N.W.2d 28
Minn. 2019
4 In re Rebeau , , 176 (Minn. 2010) ("[S]ubstantial experience as a lawyer may constitute an aggravating factor.").
- In re Eichhorn-Hicks 916 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 2018
-
In re Eichhorn-Hicks
916 N.W.2d 32
Minn. 2018
Cf. In re Rebeau , , 176 (Minn. 2010) (citing In re Overboe , , 867 (Minn. 2008) ).
- In re Klotz 909 N.W.2d 327 Minn. 2018
-
In re Klotz
909 N.W.2d 327
Minn. 2018
" In re Pitera , , 210 (Minn. 2013) (quoting In re Rebeau , , 173 (Minn. 2010) ).
-
Russell Eldon Briles,
Minn. 2018
Accordingly, the September 25 notice Briles 4 The County’s reliance on is similarly unhelpful.
- In re Disciplinary Action Against Tigue 900 N.W.2d 424 Minn. 2017
-
In re Disciplinary Action Against Tigue
900 N.W.2d 424
Minn. 2017
“Although we place great weight on the referee’s recommended discipline, we retain ultimate responsibility for determining the appropriate sanction.”
- In re Charges of Unprofessional Conduct in Panel File No. 41310 899 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 2017
-
In re Charges of Unprofessional Conduct in Panel File No. 41310
899 N.W.2d 821
Minn. 2017
The primary purpose of attorney discipline is “ ‘not to punish the attorney but rather to protect the public, to protect the judicial system, and to deter future misconduct by the disciplined attorney as well as by other attorneys.’” ().
- In re Disciplinary Action Against Saltzstein 896 N.W.2d 864 Minn. 2017
- In re Disciplinary Action Against Saltzstein 896 N.W.2d 864 Minn. 2017
- In re Disciplinary Action Against Bonner 896 N.W.2d 98 Minn. 2017
-
In re Disciplinary Action Against Bonner
896 N.W.2d 98
Minn. 2017
“The purpose of discipline for professional misconduct is ‘not to punish the attorney but rather to protect the public, to protect the judicial system, and to deter future misconduct by the disciplined attorney as well as by other attorneys.’ ” ().
- In re Disciplinary Action against O'Brien 894 N.W.2d 162 Minn. 2017
-
In re Disciplinary Action against O'Brien
894 N.W.2d 162
Minn. 2017
“The purpose of attorney discipline ‘is not to punish the attorney,’” but to protect the public and the judicial system as well as “ ‘deter future misconduct.’” ().
- In re Disciplinary Action Against Eskola 891 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 2017
-
In re Disciplinary Action Against Eskola
891 N.W.2d 294
Minn. 2017
“Although we place great weight on the referee’s recommended discipline, we retain ultimate responsibility for determining the appropriate sanction.” ().
- Briles v. 2013 GMC Terrain, MN License No.: 168KSE, VIN: 2GKFLZE3XD6336507 892 N.W.2d 525 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-
Briles v. 2013 GMC Terrain, MN License No.: 168KSE, VIN: 2GKFLZE3XD6336507
892 N.W.2d 525
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
We are not persuaded otherwise by the city’s reference to In that attorney-discipline case, the supreme court recounted that, after the forfeiting agency instituted a forfeiture under section 169A.63, the attorney’s client pleaded guilty to second-degree drunk driving and “[a]s a result, both the title to the vehicle and the insurance proceeds for the damag
- In RE Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Jesse David MATSON, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0389131 889 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 2017
-
In RE Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Jesse David MATSON, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0389131
889 N.W.2d 17
Minn. 2017
The purpose of discipline for professional misconduct is “not to punish the attorney but rather to protect the public, to protect the judicial system, and to deter future misconduct by the disciplined attorney as well as by other attorneys.”
- In re Disciplinary Action Against Pearson 888 N.W.2d 319 Minn. 2016
- In re Disciplinary Action Against Pearson 888 N.W.2d 319 Minn. 2016
- In Re CHARGES OF UNPROFESSIONAL CONDUCT IN PANEL FILE NO. 39302 884 N.W.2d 661 Minn. 2016
-
In Re CHARGES OF UNPROFESSIONAL CONDUCT IN PANEL FILE NO. 39302
884 N.W.2d 661
Minn. 2016
We do not impose sanctions in attorñey-discipline cases as punishment, but rather we impose sanctions “to protect the public, to protect the judicial system, and to deter future misconduct by the disciplined attorney [and] other attorneys.”
- In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Michael John RIEHM, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0296570 883 N.W.2d 223 Minn. 2016