Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equipment, LLC, 813 N.W.2d 49.

54 citing documents.

Valerie Steiner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equip., LLC, (concluding contractual claim for recovery of attorney fees was legal, rather than equitable, remedy and thus appellants had constitutional right to jury trial because “the nature of the claim is contractual and the remedy sought is legal”); (Minn.
The CastleRock Group, LLC, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
ownership of the Properties to the fullest extent possible.” And an equitable accounting occurs largely in two circumstances: “when a fiduciary owes an equitable duty to account and when the accounts at issue are exceedingly complicated.” United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equip., LLC, n.3 (Minn. 2012).
OCH Bookstore, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
United Prairie Bank -Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equip., LLC
Sylvester L. Zurn, individually and as beneficiary of the Sylvester L. Zurn Trust, dated December 30, 2002, et … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
when a fiduciary owes an equitable duty to account and when the accounts at issue are exceedingly complicated.” United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equip., LLC, n.3 (Minn. 2012).
Amy Sweasy Tamburino, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“[A] jury determines both the liability for a breach of contract and the amount of damages to award for the breach, if any, assuming genuine issues of material fact exist with respect to both questions that warrant submission to a jury.” United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equip., LLC, n.9 (Minn. 2012).
Matthew Davies, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See United Prairie Bank- Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equip., LLC, (concluding contractual claim for recovery of attorney fees was legal, rather than equitable, remedy and thus appellants had constitutional right to jury trial); Abraham v. County of 2 Although a party assuredly has a statutory right to a jury trial, we have not explicitly stated that an evicti
A24-0425 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
United Prairie Bank -Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equip., LLC
Star Bank, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
7 Bushmills also argues that at least a portion of the $353,831.47 judgment against it represents attorney fees awarded by the district court in the Benton County action, for which it is entitled to a jury trial under United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equip., LLC
Doug Hoskin v. Josh Krsnak Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Doug Hoskin v. Josh Krsnak Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“[A] jury determines both the liability for a breach of contract and the amount of damages to award of the breach, if any, assuming genuine issues of material fact exist with respect to both questions that warrant submission to a jury.” United Prairie Bank˗Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equip., LLC, n.9 (Minn. 2012).
Paul Herlache, Minn. 2023
But the “focus on fairness and flexibility is the hallmark of equity.” United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equip., LLC, (Dietzen, J., dissenting).
Ronald Hagle, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Onvoy, Inc. v. ALLETE, Inc., United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equip., LLC
International Fluid Power, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equip., LLC , .
JanOne Inc., formerly known as Appliance Recycling Centers of America, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Merchant & Gould P.C., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
United Prairie Bank-Mo untain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equip., LLC, 63 n.9 (Minn. 2012).
Ronald J. Bardine, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equip., LLC, 57 (Minn. 2012) (“[A] claim for a monetary payment under a contractual i ndemnity provision is a legal claim with an attendant right to a jury trial under Article I, Section 4 of the Minnesota Constitution.”).
Big-D Construction Midwest, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
If fact issues exist with respect to the indemnity agreement, they are for the jury.” United Prairie Bank -Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equip., LLC , (quotation omitted); see also Minn. R. Civ.
David Timp, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Judy E. Adams, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
14 Indemnity can “arise[] from principles of equity and fairness, rathe r than a contractual obligation,” such as when “ a party fails to discover or prevent another’ s fault and, consequently, pays damages for which the other party is primarily liable .” United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equip., LLC , n.2 (Minn. 2012).
J. Paul Robinson, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haug en Nutrition & Equip., LLC
In the Matter of the John P. Weitzel and Mary M. Weitzel 2007 Irrevocable Trust F/B/O Terese M. … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
The district court further concluded that an equitable accounting is not available here because the trust account here is not “exceedingly complicated.” See United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equip., LLC , n.3 (Minn. 2012) (providing that equitable accounting is available where a fiduciary owes an equitable duty to account and the accounts at issue are exceedingly complicated).
Patrick Dean, Joan Hunziker-Dean, individually and as derivative representatives of the Center Plaza Association of Rochester, Inc., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
18 V. An equitable accounting is primarily available only “when a fiduciary owes an equitable duty to account and when the accounts at issue are exceedingly complicated.” United Prairie Bank–Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equip., LLC, n.3 (Minn. 2012).
Johnson v. Johnson 902 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Johnson v. Johnson 902 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equip., LLC, see also Geldert v. Am.
City of Golden Valley v. Wiebesick 899 N.W.2d 152 Minn. 2017
Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of Minnesota 895 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 2017
Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of Minnesota 895 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 2017
United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equip., LLC
Cheri Glassick v. Wells Federal Bank, Stewart Title Guaranty Company, Northwest Title Agency, Inc., Tim Breuer, Manufacturers Bank … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Cheri Glassick v. Wells Federal Bank, Stewart Title Guaranty Company, Northwest Title Agency, Inc., Tim Breuer, Manufacturers Bank … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
But, as a matter of equity, a district court may award attorney fees when “the one seeking indemnity has incurred liability because of a breach of duty owed to him by the one sought to be charged.” United Prairie Bank–Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equip., LLC, n.2 (Minn. 2012) (quotation omitted); O’Connell v. Jackson, 273 Minn. 91, 96, (noting that indemnification includes attorney fees when “a party has incurred liability for damages by the tortious act or breach of duty of another and i
Melrose Gates, LLC v. Chor Moua 875 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 2016
Melrose Gates, LLC v. Chor Moua 875 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 2016
United Prairie Bank-Mountain Hake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equip., LLC, (stating that the right to a jury trial extends only to actions at law, not actions in equity); Raymond Farmers Elevator Co. v. Am.
CSM Equities, LLC v. Woodland Village Investments Limited Partnership Minn. Ct. App. 2016
CSM Equities, LLC v. Woodland Village Investments Limited Partnership Minn. Ct. App. 2016
An equitable accounting is primarily available only “when a fiduciary owes an equitable duty to account and when the accounts at issue are exceedingly complicated.” United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equip., LLC, n.3 (Minn. 2012).
Ruth Unger v. AAA Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Timothy T. Childs v. North River Road Condominium Association Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ruth Unger v. AAA Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Contractual indemnity claims are legal and the remedies for breach are ordinarily monetary, consequently a contract dispute “shall be tried by a jury.” United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equip., LLC, (“Because the nature of the claim is contractual and the remedy sought is legal, we hold that appellants are 2 It is undisputed that the Minnesota Attorney General was properly served by U.S. Mail with notice of this appeal, which complies with rules 125.03 and 144 of the Minnes
Timothy T. Childs v. North River Road Condominium Association Minn. Ct. App. 2015
TLC cites United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equip., LLC, for the proposition that there “must” be a jury trial regarding a claim for recovery of attorney fees.
In re the Estate of: Barbara Jean LaPoint Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Estate of: Barbara Jean LaPoint Minn. Ct. App. 2015
United Prairie Bank v. Haugen Nutrition & Equip., LLC, n.2 (Minn. 2012).
Kenneth A. Roseland, Law Offices of Richard E. Bosse, Chartered v. Joseph A. Wentzell, Attorney at Law, Richard … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Kenneth A. Roseland, Law Offices of Richard E. Bosse, Chartered v. Joseph A. Wentzell, Attorney at Law, Richard … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
has title to the property, has a right to redeem the property after foreclosure, and has a right to the proceeds of the sale that exceed the amount of indebtedness.” United Prairie Bank- Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equip., LLC, n.3 (Minn. App. 2010), rev’d in part on other grounds
Haugen Nutrition & Equipment, LLC v. United Prairie Bank of Mountain Lake Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Haugen Nutrition & Equipment, LLC v. United Prairie Bank of Mountain Lake Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See United Prairie Bank v. Haugen Nutrition & Equip., LLC, (affirming foreclosure), reversed in part on other grounds
Darrel Schmitz v. United States Steel Corporation 852 N.W.2d 669 Minn. 2014
Darrel Schmitz v. United States Steel Corporation 852 N.W.2d 669 Minn. 2014
United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equip., LLC
Weiss v. Private Capital, LLC 839 N.W.2d 106 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Weiss v. Private Capital, LLC 839 N.W.2d 106 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Our application of Schifsky in the context of a contract-based request for attorney fees must be informed by the supreme court’s recent opinion in United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equip., LLC, which held that a party seeking attorney fees based on a contract is entitled to a jury trial on that issue, pursuant to article I, section 4, of the Minnesota Constitution.
State v. Castillo-Alvarez 836 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 2013
State v. Castillo-Alvarez 836 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 2013
United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equip., LLC
State v. M.D.T. 831 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 2013

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by