Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Diede, 795 N.W.2d 836.
- State of Minnesota v. Vernon David Matter Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Scott Andrew Syversrud Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
State of Minnesota v. Scott Andrew Syversrud
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Findings of fact are clearly erroneous if, on the entire evidence, we are left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake occurred.” –47 (Minn. 2011).
- State of Minnesota v. Michael Patrick Morin Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
State of Minnesota v. Michael Patrick Morin
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
is not properly before this court”); see also Lothenbach, d at 857 (“The traditional viewpoint in Minnesota, as well as elsewhere, has been that a guilty plea by a counseled defendant operates as a waiver of all nonjurisdictional defects, including Fourth Amendment claims.”).2 1 n.2 (Minn. 2011) (noting that Lothenbach was “superseded” by Minn. R. Crim.
- Andrew Joseph Sauter v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Andrew Joseph Sauter v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Jerome Alden Streitz, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Ronald Wayne Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Ronald Wayne Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
State of Minnesota v. Jerome Alden Streitz, Jr.
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Although the reasonable suspicion standard is “not high,” it requires more than a hunch and “at least a minimal level of objective justification for making the stop.” (quotations omitted).
- State of Minnesota v. Aamir Karmoeddien Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
State of Minnesota v. Aamir Karmoeddien
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Findings of fact are clearly erroneous if, on the entire evidence, [the court is] left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake occurred.” -47 (Minn. 2011).
- Damon Dewitt Tackett v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Damon Dewitt Tackett v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Charles Carlester Powell Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Charles Carlester Powell Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Terry Gordon Wurtz Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Nathan John Reynolds Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
State of Minnesota v. Nathan John Reynolds
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
4 the definite and firm conviction that a mistake occurred.” d 836, 846–47 (Minn. 2011).
-
State of Minnesota v. Terry Gordon Wurtz
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
When parties stipulate to the facts, we review de novo the district court’s determination of whether reasonable suspicion of criminal activity exists to expand the stop, and of whether a person was in custody for Miranda purposes.
- Joel Gary Borchardt v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Joel Gary Borchardt v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Kristin Marie Poeschel v. Commissioner of Public Safety 871 N.W.2d 39 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Kristin Marie Poeschel v. Commissioner of Public Safety 871 N.W.2d 39 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Bryan Anthony Hartshorn Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Jesse Lee Weseman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Joseph Wayne Hexom Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Eric Dennis Carter v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Joseph Wayne Hexom Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Bryan Anthony Hartshorn Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Eric Dennis Carter v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Jesse Lee Weseman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Bryan Anthony Case Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Peter Alan Krech v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Ryan John Nordell v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
Peter Alan Krech v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“[T]he ‘clearly erroneous’ standard controls [appellate] review of a district court’s finding of voluntary consent.”
-
State of Minnesota v. Bryan Anthony Case
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
And the expansion of the stop from these initial bases to a search for drugs was not justified based merely on appellant’s association with suspected drug dealers or a known “meth-house.”
-
Ryan John Nordell v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(citing Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 219, 93 S. Ct. 2041, 2043-44 (1973)).
- State of Minnesota v. Charles Edward Gorgol Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Justin Steven Luedke v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Zachary Michael McGowan Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Justin Steven Luedke v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Zachary Michael McGowan Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
State of Minnesota v. Charles Edward Gorgol
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“[W]e will defer to the findings of the district court on the voluntariness of the consent, unless those findings are clearly erroneous.”
- State of Minnesota v. Joseph John West, IV Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Joseph John West, IV Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Paul Vang Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Paul Vang Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Delbert Keith Sybrandt Minn. Ct. App. 2015