Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Flowers, 788 N.W.2d 120.
- State of Minnesota v. Joshua Lee Littlewolf Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Lee Littlewolf
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See, d 120, 133 n.2 (Minn. 2010).1 If the state’s direct evidence, by itself, is sufficient to prove 1 In Flowers, the supreme court applied the traditional standard of review because “[t]he State presented direct evidence on each element of the offense.” d at 133 n.2.
- Ricky Alan Geving v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Ricky Alan Geving v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. David Lee King Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Garry Brad Hendrickson, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. David Lee King Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
State of Minnesota v. Garry Brad Hendrickson, Jr.
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See, (stating that we review the entire record to determine whether the evidence permits the district court to reasonably conclude that a defendant is guilty of the crime charged).
- State of Minnesota v. Mahdi Hassan Ali 855 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 2014
-
State of Minnesota v. Mahdi Hassan Ali
855 N.W.2d 235
Minn. 2014
See, (affirming two consecutive life sentences for a 16-year-old who murdered two people while trying to rob a house); (holding.
- State of Minnesota v. Jimmy Lee Morris Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Jimmy Lee Morris Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- State v. Bahtuoh 840 N.W.2d 804 Minn. 2013
-
State v. Bahtuoh
840 N.W.2d 804
Minn. 2013
Mahkuk, d at 682 (citing Gates, d at 337 ); -34 (Minn.2010) (relying on the “knowing role” language in reviewing a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence in an accomplice-liability case).
- State v. Porte 832 N.W.2d 303 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
- State v. Porte 832 N.W.2d 303 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
- State v. Silvernail 831 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 2013