Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Gatson, 801 N.W.2d 134.

158 citing documents.

State v. Porte 832 N.W.2d 303 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Porte 832 N.W.2d 303 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Seaver 820 N.W.2d 627 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Seaver 820 N.W.2d 627 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Rather, “the focus of the inquiry is on the facial validity of the explanation.” see Purkett v. Elem, 514 U.S. 765, 768 , 115 S.Ct.
State v. Smith 819 N.W.2d 724 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Smith 819 N.W.2d 724 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
(quotation omitted) (explaining that Minnesota applies the civil substantial factor definition of causation in criminal vehicular homicide and operation cases); (holding that defendant’s actions were a substantial factor if he “injured the victim, which in turn led to the victim’s death”) ().
State v. Nelson 806 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Nelson 806 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 2011