Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Gatson, 801 N.W.2d 134.

158 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Deionte Jaewon Parker Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Regarding the causation requirement, “the State must prove the defendant’s acts were a substantial causal factor leading to the death.” (quotation omitted).
Cedric Lamont Berry v. State of Minnesota Minn. 2026
(noting our presumption that “juries follow instructions given by the court” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted)).
State of Minnesota v. Nicholas James Firkus Minn. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Nicholas James Firkus Minn. 2026
As important, no direct evidence contradicts the fact that Heidi made the statements, and it is not susceptible to a 11 in which we found it was a circumstance proved that the defendant fabricated an alibi, to support its argument that “reject[ing] a defendant’s testimony positively establishes the opposite conclusion.” But in that case the defendant initially provided an alibi, then later admitted that he drove his
State of Minnesota v. Johnathon Brock Mattson-McCarty Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Johnathon Brock Mattson-McCarty Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“A defendant is entitled to a specific instruction if the trial evidence supports the instruction and the substance of the proposed instruction is not already contained in 10 instructions chosen by the district court.” (–48 (Minn. 2011); ), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Corey Devon Young Minn. Ct. App. 2025
A district court has “considerable latitude in selecting language for jury instructions.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Ali Dayib Warsame Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Kevin Herman Larson Minn. Ct. App. 2025
A district court has “considerable latitude in selecting language for jury instructions.” 11 (Minn. 2011) (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Mark Anthony Burciaga Minn. Ct. App. 2025
It is true that “[a] defendant is entitled to an instruction on his theory of the case if there is evidence to support it.”
State of Minnesota v. Robert James Cerney, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
A district court has “considerable latitude in selecting language for jury instructions.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Lukas Devlen Fineday Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(“We presume that juries follow instructions given by the court and thereby recognize the effectiveness of curative instructions.” (quotation omitted)); WL 6442166, at *4 (Minn. App. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Glen Alvin Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
A district court has “considerable latitude in selecting language for jury instructions.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Elsa E. Segura Minn. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Elsa E. Segura Minn. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Julian Daniel Valdez Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Julian Daniel Valdez Minn. Ct. App. 2023
A district court is given “considerable latitude in selecting language for jury instructions.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Willie Coagar Skylark Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(stating that juries presumably follow instructions).
State of Minnesota v. Isaiah Jacob Bonin Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Kristi Dannette Mcneilly Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“Alleged errors in jury instructions are reviewed under the harmless error test.” -48 (Minn. 2011).
State of Minnesota v. Kemar Anthony Hawkins Minn. Ct. App. 2022
To prove that a defendant’s conduct was a “substantial factor” in causing the death of another “[i]t must be shown that the defendant’s acts injured the victim which then led to the victim’s death.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Raeleen Kay Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2022
those acts with which the defendant is charged in the complaint.” The district court then cautioned the jury, “This evidence is not to be used to prove the character of the defendant, or that defendant acted in conformity with such character.” “We presume that juries follow instructions given by the court and thereby recognize the effectiveness of curative instructions.” (quotation omitted); see also Welle, d at 366 ().
State of Minnesota v. Cermor Rio Boakai Minn. Ct. App. 2022
9 (“We presume that juries follow instructions given b y the court and thereby recognize the effectiveness of curative instructions.” (quotation omitted)).
State of Minnesota v. Marsean Juan Crockett Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Michael John Czarnecki Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State v. Gatson , (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Paul Andrew Youngstedt Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State v. Gatson , (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Alan Korolchuk Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Sid Brady Strickland-Green, III Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A district court has “‘considerable latitude’ in selecting language for jury instructions.” State v. Gatson , (
State of Minnesota v. Brock William Fredin Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State v. Gatson , (Mi nn.
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Alan McRaven Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Jesse Lee Bonacci-Koski Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See, (criminal vehicular homicide); (first -degree murder); State v. McCormick , d 498, 507 -08 (Minn. App. 2013) (second -degree manslaughter), review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Justin Arthur Barron Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Deon Dell Griffin Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Eli Samuel Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Aaron Duviaze Taylor Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A district court has “considerable latitude in selecting language for jury instructions.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Tamico Annette Reed Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota, Minn. 2019
-57 (Minn. 2013) (upholding a peremptory challenge when there were discrepancies regarding criminal history between the prospective juror’s oral and written voir dire); –43 (Minn. 2011) (upholding a peremptory challenge when there were inconsistencies in a prospective juror’s answers about a friend’s criminal trial); see also Onyelobi, d at 347 (upholding a peremptory challenge because a prima facie case was not made and also noting that a prospective juror did not d
State of Minnesota v. Jeremy Darryl Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A district court has “considerable latitude in selecting language for jury instructions.” State v. Gatson , (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Steven Douglas Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Elwin Louis Klimek v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
” State v. Gatson , (quotation omitted) .
State of Minnesota v. Antonio Terrell Beasley Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Timothy Lee Vredenburg Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Blanyon Toe Davies Minn. Ct. App. 2019
d 134, 151 (Minn. 2011) (noting that curative instruction s lessen the risk of prejudice) .
State of Minnesota v. Justin Darrell Reynolds Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Tyler Lee Gerard Glaser Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. David Garrett Tynes Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. DeAntae Demond Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. James Ernest Piere Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Isiah Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Geoffrey Robinson Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A district court has “considerable latitude ” in the selection of language for jury instructions, and “we will not reverse where jury instructions overall fairly a nd correctly state the applicable law.”