Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite U.S. Bank N. A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co., 802 N.W.2d 363.
-
Steve Enestvedt, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
v. Cold Spring Granite Co., (quotation omitted).
-
Amy Sweasy Tamburino, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
v. Cold Spring Granite Co.
-
Maria Olson, et al., Appellants,
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
v. Cold Spring Granite Co.
-
Minn. 2024
v. Cold Spring Granite Co., (using the common-law meaning of fraud to understand the ordinary meaning of the word fraud in Minn. Stat. § 302A.423 (2010)); (without citation, using the common-law meaning of “from the person” in the theft statute, Minn. Stat. § 609.52, subd
-
James R. Pavelka, Jr., Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
v. Cold Spring Granite Co., (citations omitted).
-
Stacy Demskie, et al., Appellants,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
v. Cold Spring Granite Co., 378 (Minn. 2011)) (emphasis added).
-
Lynn Peterson, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
v. Cold Spring Granite Co., 73-74 (Minn. 2011) (stating that allegedly concealed information was immaterial where testimony revealed that the information would not have been relied on even if it were available).
-
Dr. Eric Steffen, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
v. Cold Spring Granite Co., (quotation omitted).
-
Merchant & Gould P.C., Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
v. Cold Spring Granite Co.
-
Everest Stables, Inc., Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
v. Cold Spring Granite Co.
-
Soua Vang, Relator,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
v. Cold Spring Granite Co.
-
Shamrock Sod & Landscaping, Inc., et al., Appellants,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
v. Cold Spring Granite Co.
-
State of Minnesota, by its Commissioner of Transportation, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
v. Cold Spring Granite Co.
-
Mary K. Strauss, on behalf of her minor child, Finley Strauss, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
v. Cold Spring Granite Co.
- Lund v. Lund 924 N.W.2d 274 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-
Lund v. Lund
924 N.W.2d 274
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
v. Cold Spring Granite Co. , , 366, 378 (Minn. 2011).
-
A17-2040
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
v. Cold Spring Granite Co ., Honeywell asserts that although “the current effective -date language is different from that used in prior amendments, the language is not unique in Minnesota and, for 40 years, courts have consistently interpreted it to refer to the date on which a plaintiff’s cause of action accrues.” .
-
Ricky Johnson, d/b/a Rick Johnson’s Deer and Beaver, Inc., Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
v. Cold Spring Granite Co. , 70 (Minn. 2011).
-
U. S. Bank National Association, successor by merger to U. S. Bank National Association ND, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
v. Cold Spring Granite Co.
-
Edna Ruth Albertson, et al., Appellants,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
v. Cold Spring Granite Co., and “is to be interpreted liberally,” Bolander v. Bolander , review dismissed (Minn. Nov.
- Blum v. Thompson 901 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-
Blum v. Thompson
901 N.W.2d 203
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
v. Cold Spring Granite Co., , 379 & n.10 (Minn. 2011) ( review denied (Minn. Sept.
-
In re the Marriage of: Pamela J. Atkinson n/k/a Pamela J. Kraker, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
v. Cold Spring Granite Co.
- David Brian Pemrick v. Lori Ann Bucher Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-
David Brian Pemrick v. Lori Ann Bucher
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
v. Cold Spring Granite Co., (noting a common-law claim of fraud requires proof of a false representation); Stuempges v. Parke, Davis & Co., (noting true statements are not actionable in a defamation action).
- William J. Anderson v. Trails End Enterprises of Duluth, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
William J. Anderson v. Trails End Enterprises of Duluth, LLC
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
v. Cold Spring Granite Co.
- Virgenia M. Ryan v. Potlatch Corporation and Self-Insured/Comp Cost, Inc., Relators. 882 N.W.2d 220 Minn. 2016
-
Virgenia M. Ryan v. Potlatch Corporation and Self-Insured/Comp Cost, Inc., Relators.
882 N.W.2d 220
Minn. 2016
v. Cold Spring Granite Co., (quoting Minn. Stat. § 645.16 (2014)).
- Hunter Daniel Hanlon v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
Hunter Daniel Hanlon v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
v. Cold Spring Granite Co., (citing Gruenhagen v. Larson, 310 Minn. 454, 458, ); see also Hartman v. Blanding’s Inc., 288 Minn. 415, 423
- Michael Alan Mooney v. UnitedHealth Group Incorporated, Stephen L. Hemsley, William W. McGuire, David J. Lubben Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- Michael Alan Mooney v. UnitedHealth Group Incorporated, Stephen L. Hemsley, William W. McGuire, David J. Lubben Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- Graphic Communications Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund "A", Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. CVS Caremark Corporation, Appellants/Cross-Respondents, Coborn's Incorporated, Appellant/Cross-Respondent, … 850 N.W.2d 682 Minn. 2014
-
Graphic Communications Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund "A", Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. CVS Caremark Corporation, Appellants/Cross-Respondents, Coborn's Incorporated, Appellant/Cross-Respondent, …
850 N.W.2d 682
Minn. 2014
v. Cold Spring Granite Co.
- Lakes Area Business Ass'n v. City of Forest Lake 842 N.W.2d 320 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
Lakes Area Business Ass'n v. City of Forest Lake
842 N.W.2d 320
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
v. Cold Spring Granite Co., (stating that the court of appeals is “bound to apply the law as written”), aff'd, Lino Lakes Econ.
- Dukowitz v. Hannon Security Services 841 N.W.2d 147 Minn. 2014
-
Dukowitz v. Hannon Security Services
841 N.W.2d 147
Minn. 2014
v. Cold Spring Granite Co., both of which we concluded were absent in Nelson.
- Finn v. Alliance Bank 838 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
-
Finn v. Alliance Bank
838 N.W.2d 585
Minn. Ct. App. 2013
v. Cold Spring Granite Co., (quotation omitted).
- In re the Welfare of J.J.P. 831 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 2013
-
In re the Welfare of J.J.P.
831 N.W.2d 260
Minn. 2013
v. Cold Spring Granite Co., (explaining that this court only considers extrinsic evidence of the Legislature’s intent when the statute is ambiguous); Schatz, d at 651 (stating that the rule of construction that the Legislature did not intend an absurd result applies to an unambiguous statute only in the rare case when “
- Sanchez v. State 816 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 2012
-
Sanchez v. State
816 N.W.2d 550
Minn. 2012
v. Cold Spring Granite Co., (quoting Gassler, d at 586; ).
- Graves v. Wayman 816 N.W.2d 655 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
-
Graves v. Wayman
816 N.W.2d 655
Minn. Ct. App. 2012
v. Cold Spring Granite Co.
- Schatz v. Interfaith Care Center 811 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 2012
-
Schatz v. Interfaith Care Center
811 N.W.2d 643
Minn. 2012
v. Cold Spring Granite Co., (quoting Minn.Stat.
- In re the Welfare of the Child of E.A.C. 812 N.W.2d 165 Minn. Ct. App. 2012