DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Roby v. State, 787 N.W.2d 186.

23 citing documents.

  • Diamond Lee Jamal Griffin, Minn. 2021
    The petition does not need to “include [a] specific citation to a subdivision 4(b) exception to invoke it.”
  • Kevin Terrance Hannon, Minn. 2021
    In our review of Hannon’s claims, we are required to “liberally construe the [postconviction] petition.” Minn. Stat. § 590.03 (2020); (applying this pleading provision to consideration of postconviction petitions on appeal).
  • Minn. 2019
    See Minn. Stat. § 590.03 (2018)
  • Jason Maurice Fagin, Minn. 2019
    See, (stating that a petition need not include specific citation to a subdivision 4(b) exception to invoke the exception because petitions must be liberally construed under Minn. Stat. § 590.03 (2018)); (same).
  • Andrew Wayne Clarke, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
  • Thomas Daniel Rhodes v. State of Minnesota, A13-560 875 N.W.2d 779 Minn. 2016
  • Wallace v. State 820 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 2012
  • Wallace v. State 820 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 2012
    However, a postconviction petition need not “include specific citation to a subdivision 4(b) exception to invoke it.”
  • Carlton v. State 816 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 2012
  • Carlton v. State 816 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 2012
    2011) (liberally construing a petition to analyze whether petitioner met the newly discovered evidence exception even though he had not “explicitly invoke[d] the newly discovered evidence exception” and allowing the petitioner an opportunity to file a new petition to allege evidence with a “suf *605 ficient indicia of reliability” to meet the newly discovered evidence exception)
  • Colbert v. State 811 N.W.2d 103 Minn. 2012
  • Colbert v. State 811 N.W.2d 103 Minn. 2012
    (noting that before considering whether the petitioner has established an exception under subdivision 4(b), we first determine whether the petition was filed within the time limit established by Minn.Stat.
  • Roby v. State 808 N.W.2d 20 Minn. 2011
  • Roby v. State 808 N.W.2d 20 Minn. 2011
    See Roby v. State (Roby IV), -92 (Minn.2010).
  • Miles v. State 800 N.W.2d 778 Minn. 2011
  • Miles v. State 800 N.W.2d 778 Minn. 2011
    that “a petition for postconviction relief does not need to include specific citation to a subdivision 4(b) exception to invoke it.
  • State v. Hester 796 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 2011
  • State v. Hester 796 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 2011
  • Rickert v. State 795 N.W.2d 236 Minn. 2011
  • Rickert v. State 795 N.W.2d 236 Minn. 2011
    we recently addressed the pleading requirements to invoke an exception under subdivision 4(b) to the two-year time-bar.
  • State v. Gaiovnik 794 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 2011
  • State v. Gaiovnik 794 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 2011