Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Campbell, 814 N.W.2d 1.

89 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Washington 894 N.W.2d 168 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Washington 894 N.W.2d 168 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
But when the sentencing ■ issue involves interpretation of the sentencing guidelines, we review the statutory construction and interpretation of sentencing guidelines de novo, and we “apply the rules of statutory construction to our interpretation of the sentencing guidelines.” (citation omitted).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“[I]nterpretation of the sentencing guidelines are subject to de novo review.”
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Greene Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Greene Minn. Ct. App. 2017
We apply the rules of statutory construction to our interpretation of the sentencing guidelines.” (citation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Bryan Blocker Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Bryan Blocker Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Interpretation of the sentencing guidelines is a legal question that [this court] review[s] de novo.”
Jonathan Nicholas Turner v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jonathan Nicholas Turner v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Derrick Jacqueay Roberson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Derrick Jacqueay Roberson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Lee Myhre 875 N.W.2d 799 Minn. 2016
Ali M. Shire v. Rosemount, Inc., Self-Insured/Berkley Risk Administrators Company, LLC, Relators, and Twin Cities Orthopedics, P.A., Crosstown … 875 N.W.2d 289 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Lee Myhre 875 N.W.2d 799 Minn. 2016
4 n. 4 (Minn.2012) (declining to reach an issue that was not raised in the district court or before the court of appeals).
Ali M. Shire v. Rosemount, Inc., Self-Insured/Berkley Risk Administrators Company, LLC, Relators, and Twin Cities Orthopedics, P.A., Crosstown … 875 N.W.2d 289 Minn. 2016
500, -91 (Minn.2013) (citing case law and dictionary definitions of the phrase “relating to”); (Stras, J., dissenting) (relying on dictionary definitions but observing that our case law had reached the same result).
State of Minnesota v. Forest Grant Noggle Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Forest Grant Noggle Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Arteco Marvell Rhodes Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Arteco Marvell Rhodes Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jason Lamont Armstrong Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jason Lamont Armstrong Minn. Ct. App. 2015
We apply the rules of statutory construction to our interpretation of the sentencing guidelines.” (citations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Michael John Mahle Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Michael John Mahle Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“The Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines state at the outset that they apply only to felonies.”
Sarah N. Lewis, Relator (A14-0106), Carole M. Smith, Relator (A14-0107), Leslie J. Shank, Relator (A14-0108), Sunmi Chang, Relator … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Victor Dupree Whitehead Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Victor Dupree Whitehead Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Martin David Hutchins, Jr. 856 N.W.2d 281 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Martin David Hutchins, Jr. 856 N.W.2d 281 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(stating that interpretation of the sentencing guidelines is reviewed de novo).
State of Minnesota v. Don Antoine Jones 848 N.W.2d 528 Minn. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Don Antoine Jones 848 N.W.2d 528 Minn. 2014
State v. Wenthe 839 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 2013
State v. Wenthe 839 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 2013
State v. Mayl 836 N.W.2d 368 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Mayl 836 N.W.2d 368 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Greenman 825 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Johnson v. State 820 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 2012