Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Smith, 814 N.W.2d 346.

171 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Ricky Harry Gruber 864 N.W.2d 628 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ricardo Leonard Bowman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(acknowledging that “[the supreme court] ha[s] been reluctant to rely on nervous behavior as evidence to support a reasonable, articulable suspicion of criminal activity” but considering defendant’s nervousness in conjunction with evasive explanation for his shakiness and officers’ inferences or
State of Minnesota v. Ricky Harry Gruber 864 N.W.2d 628 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ashley Shayia Lee, (A14-1503), State of Minnesota v. Tasheanna Yvonne Moore, (A14-1504). Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ashley Shayia Lee, (A14-1503), State of Minnesota v. Tasheanna Yvonne Moore, (A14-1504). Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21, 88 S. Ct. 1868 (1968); –52 (Minn. 2012).
State of Minnesota v. Chris William Savage Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Chris William Savage Minn. Ct. App. 2015
An appellate court “review[s] de novo a district court’s determination of reasonable suspicion of illegal activity.”
State of Minnesota v. Yee Leng Vue Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Yee Leng Vue Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Thus, “each incremental intrusion during the stop” must be “‘tied to and justified by one of the following: (1) the original legitimate purpose of the stop, (2) independent probable cause, or (3) reasonableness, as defined in Terry.’” (quoting Askerooth, d at 365).
State of Minnesota v. Todd Timothy Clark Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Todd Timothy Clark Minn. Ct. App. 2014
It is an “objective, totality-of-the-circumstances test,” which asks “whether the facts available to the officer at the moment of the [search would] warrant a man of reasonable caution in the belief that the action taken was appropriate.” – 52 (Minn. 2012) (quotations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Shawn Elson Randall Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Shawn Elson Randall Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Thus, “each incremental intrusion during the stop” must be “‘tied to and justified by one of the following: (1) the original legitimate purpose of the stop, (2) independent probable cause, or (3) reasonableness, as defined in Terry.’” (quoting Askerooth, d at 365).
Lucas Gordon Bunde v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Lucas Gordon Bunde v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Appellate courts “review de novo a district court’s determination of reasonable suspicion of illegal activity.” d 346, 350 (Minn. 2012).
State of Minnesota v. La�Rog Daquan Meadows Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. La�Rog Daquan Meadows Minn. Ct. App. 2014
When reviewing pretrial orders on suppression motions, we review for clear error the district court’s factual findings, review de novo its legal determination, and review de novo its “determination of reasonable suspicion of illegal activity,” d 346, 350 (Minn. 2012).
State v. Eichers 840 N.W.2d 210 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Eichers 840 N.W.2d 210 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Hoekstra v. Commissioner of Public Safety 839 N.W.2d 536 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Hoekstra v. Commissioner of Public Safety 839 N.W.2d 536 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
“The reasonable-suspicion standard is not high,” Diede, d at 843 (quotation omitted), and “is less de *539 manding than probable cause or a preponderance of the evidence,” (quotation omitted).