Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Brown, 815 N.W.2d 609.
- State of Minnesota v. Lue Yang, Appellant.State of Minnesota v. Lue Yang Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Lue Yang, Appellant.State of Minnesota v. Lue Yang Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- State v. Bahtuoh 840 N.W.2d 804 Minn. 2013
-
State v. Bahtuoh
840 N.W.2d 804
Minn. 2013
-21 (Minn.2012), however, we concluded that an accomplice-liability instruction that featured language about “presence” that was similar to the instruction challenged by Bahtuoh, and materially identical to the language criticized in Mahkuk , was not erroneous.
- State v. Hicks 837 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
- State v. Hicks 837 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
- State v. Silvernail 831 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 2013
- State v. Silvernail 831 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 2013
- State v. Irby 820 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
- State v. Irby 820 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 2012