Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Bahtuoh, 840 N.W.2d 804.

114 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Clarence Bruce Beaulieu 859 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 2015
1544 ) (alteration in original)
State of Minnesota v. Patrick William Benton 858 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Patrick William Benton 858 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Travis Clay Andersen Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Travis Clay Andersen Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Timothy John Huber Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Timothy John Huber Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Michael Tuseth Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Michael Tuseth Minn. Ct. App. 2014
If these requirements are established, we “will order a new trial only if the error seriously affected the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.”
Lincoln Lamar Caldwell v. State of Minnesota 853 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Eddie Matthew Mosley 853 N.W.2d 789 Minn. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Eddie Matthew Mosley 853 N.W.2d 789 Minn. 2014
If the appellant satisfies the first three prongs of the plain-error doctrine, “we may correct the error only if it ‘seriously affect[s] the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.’ ” (quoting Johnson v. United States, 520 U.S. 461, 467 (1997))
State of Minnesota v. Enamidem Celestine Okon Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Enamidem Celestine Okon Minn. Ct. App. 2014
But all of these are matters of trial strategy, and appellate courts “do not second- guess trial counsel’s decisions about trial strategy.” n.3 (Minn. 2013); (decisions such as what evidence to present, what witnesses to call, what objections to make, and what information to include in opening and closing statements are left to counsel’s discretion).