Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Eclipse Architectural Group, Inc. v. Lam, 814 N.W.2d 692.

45 citing documents.

In re Resolution Reversing the Planning Commission's Decision to Grant the Petition for an Environmental Assessment ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re Resolution Reversing the Planning Commission's Decision to Grant the Petition for an Environmental Assessment ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“[W]hen interpreting a statute we read and construe the statute as a whole, giving effect wherever possible to all of its provisions, and interpreting each section in light of the surrounding sections to avoid conflicting interpretations.” Eclipse Architectural Grp., v. Lam, (quotation omitted).
A23-0039 A23-0041 A23-0277 Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Lighthouse Management Inc., Plaintiff, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“To perfect a mechanic’s lien, a lien claimant must file and serve a statement of the claim within 120 days of completi ng work on the property.” Eclipse Architectural Grp., see also Minn. Stat. § 514.08.
Timothy Gieseke, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
P. 3.01 (a); see also Eclipse Architectural Grp., Inc. v. Lam , d 692, 697 (Minn. 2012) (“A summons is a writ or process commencing the plaintiff’s action and requiring the defendant to appear and answer.” (quotation omitted)).
Verhein v. Piper 917 N.W.2d 96 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Harstad v. City of Woodbury 902 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Harstad v. City of Woodbury 902 N.W.2d 64 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
While chapter 462 does not define “cash deposit,” the common and ordinary meaning of deposit is “money or other property” given “to another who promises to preserve it or to use it and return it in kind.” Black's Law Dictionary 533 (10th ed. 2014); see Eclipse Architectural Grp., (relying on dictionary definition of statutory term to determine common and ordinary meaning in absence of statutory definition).
In re the Estate of Nelson 901 N.W.2d 234 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Estate of Nelson 901 N.W.2d 234 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
When interpreting a statute, appellate courts “read and construe the statute as a whole, giving effect wherever possible to all of its provisions, and interpreting each section in light of the surrounding sections to avoid conflicting interpretations.” Eclipse Architectural Grp., (quotation omitted).
A16-1546 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
When interpreting a statute, appellate courts “read and construe the statute as a whole, giving effect wherever possible to all of its provisions, and interpreting each section in light of the surrounding sections to avoid conflicting interpretations.” Eclipse Architectural Grp., (quotation omitted).
Followed Jane Doe, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Founders Insurance Company v. James Yates 888 N.W.2d 134 Minn. 2016
Founders Insurance Company v. James Yates 888 N.W.2d 134 Minn. 2016
“[W]hen interpreting a statute, we read and construe the statute as a whole, giving effect whenever possible to all of its provisions.” Eclipse Architectural Grp.
650 North Main Association v. Frauenshuh, Inc. (Territorial Springs Riverview, LLC, Frauenshuh Sweeney, LLC), Kraus-Anderson Construction Company, Doe … 885 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In Re the Custody of: A. J. O. David Ortiz v. Sarah Judith Un Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In Re the Custody of: A. J. O. David Ortiz v. Sarah Judith Un Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Yer Sumner v. Jim Lupient Infiniti and SFM Risk Solutions, North Memorial Health Care and Mercy Hospital, Relators, … Minn. 2015
Sumner v. Jim Lupient Infiniti 865 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 2015
Sumner v. Jim Lupient Infiniti 865 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 2015
See Eclipse Architectural Grp., (rejecting an argument that the use of two different terms in a statute created an ambiguity because the two terms were consistently used as synonyms).
Yer Sumner v. Jim Lupient Infiniti and SFM Risk Solutions, North Memorial Health Care and Mercy Hospital, Relators, … Minn. 2015
See Eclipse Architectural Grp., (rejecting an argument that the use of two 5 different terms in a statute created an ambiguity because the two terms were consistently used as synonyms).
In the Matter of the Child of: C. A. L. and R. C. R., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Child of: C. A. L. and R. C. R., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Roger Benedict Schmid 859 N.W.2d 816 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Roger Benedict Schmid 859 N.W.2d 816 Minn. 2015
We are to “read and construe the statute as a whole, giving effect wherever possible to all of its provisions, and ‘interpret[ing] each section in light of the surrounding sections to avoid conflicting interpretations.’ ” Eclipse Architectural Grp., (quoting Am.
In re the Marriage of: Moslais X. Vue v. Khue Vue Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Moslais X. Vue v. Khue Vue Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Timothy E. Lewis v. Paul J. Borchert Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Timothy E. Lewis v. Paul J. Borchert Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Todd C. Sharkey v. City of Shoreview, Jerome P. Filla, Kari L. Quinn, Thomas R. Hughes 853 N.W.2d 832 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Todd C. Sharkey v. City of Shoreview, Jerome P. Filla, Kari L. Quinn, Thomas R. Hughes 853 N.W.2d 832 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
a question of law that we review de novo.” Eclipse Architectural Grp.
Zirnhelt v. Carter 843 N.W.2d 270 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Zirnhelt v. Carter 843 N.W.2d 270 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re Minnesota Power for Authority to Increase Rates for Electric Service in Minnesota 838 N.W.2d 747 Minn. 2013
In re Minnesota Power for Authority to Increase Rates for Electric Service in Minnesota 838 N.W.2d 747 Minn. 2013
Grp., (noting that we are to “read and construe the statute as a whole, giving effect wherever possible to all of its provisions, and ‘interpreting] each section in light of the surrounding sections to avoid conflicting interpretations)’ ” (quoting Am.
North Star International Trucks, Inc. v. Navistar, Inc. 837 N.W.2d 320 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
North Star International Trucks, Inc. v. Navistar, Inc. 837 N.W.2d 320 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
In re Application of Skyline Materials, Ltd. 835 N.W.2d 472 Minn. 2013
In re Application of Skyline Materials, Ltd. 835 N.W.2d 472 Minn. 2013
Recently we stated: “A ‘summons’ is ‘[a] writ or process commencing the plaintiff’s action and requiring the defendant to appear and answer.’ ” Eclipse Architectural Grp., (alteration in original) (emphasis added) (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary 1574 (9th ed.2009)); (concluding that an appeal in an assessment proceeding initiates a civil action); Doerr v. Warner, 247 Minn. 98, 103
Continental Hydraulics Inc. v. Department of Employment & Economic Development 832 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Continental Hydraulics Inc. v. Department of Employment & Economic Development 832 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Eclipse Architectural Grp.
Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of Minnesota 834 N.W.2d 741 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of Minnesota 834 N.W.2d 741 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Eclipse Architectural Grp., (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary 1325 (9th ed.2009) (quotation marks omitted)).
League of Women Voters Minnesota v. Ritchie 819 N.W.2d 636 Minn. 2012
League of Women Voters Minnesota v. Ritchie 819 N.W.2d 636 Minn. 2012
See Eclipse Architectural Grp., (concluding where the Legislature used both the terms "service” and "delivery” in a statutory scheme that "[b]e-cause service and delivery are consistently used synonymously in the context of personal service, there is no basis for us to conclude that the Legislature intended the two terms to be appli