Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Ndikum, 815 N.W.2d 816.

60 citing documents.

State v. Salyers 842 N.W.2d 28 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Salyers 842 N.W.2d 28 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
2 (banning sawed-off shotguns), 609.667(2) (obliterated serial numbers) (2012); -19, 822 (Minn.2012) (reading a mens rea requirement into stat-útes -prohibiting possession of handguns).
State v. Yarbrough 841 N.W.2d 619 Minn. 2014
State v. Yarbrough 841 N.W.2d 619 Minn. 2014
State v. Rohan 834 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Rohan 834 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Garcia-Gutierrez 830 N.W.2d 919 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Garcia-Gutierrez 830 N.W.2d 919 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
“Mens rea is the element of a crime that requires the defendant know the facts that make his conduct illegal.” (quotation omitted).
State v. McCauley 820 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. McCauley 820 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
(citing Staples v. United States, 511 U.S. 600, 606-07 , 114 S.Ct.