Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Ndikum, 815 N.W.2d 816.

60 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Neisen, d at 329; see also State v. Ndikum , (noting that offenses with “small penalties like fines and short jail sentences” typically are strict-liability offenses (quotation omitted)).
Joe Leko, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Joel Armen Underwood, III v. State of Minnesota Minn. 2025
Joel Armen Underwood, III v. State of Minnesota Minn. 2025
“Mens rea is the element of a crime that requires the defendant know the facts that make his conduct illegal.” d 816, 818 (Minn. 2012) (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Raymond Allen Torgerson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Raymond Allen Torgerson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See, (reading a knowledge requirement into possession-of -a- pistol-in-public statute); (reading a knowledge requirement into possession-of-a-knife-while-on-school-property statute); (reading a knowle
State of Minnesota v. Samuel James Lyons Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Samuel James Lyons Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
2(b); (stating that statutory silence is typically insufficient to dispense with the mens rea requirement).
State of Minnesota, Respondent Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“Mens rea is the element of a crime that requires the defendant know the facts that make his conduct illegal.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“Statutes that dispense with mens rea and do not require the defendant to know the facts that make [her] conduct illegal impose strict criminal liability.” (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the Welfare of: J. C. L., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
1(1)-2(1); see State v. Ndikum , (“Mens rea is the element of a crime that requires the defendant know the facts that make his conduct illegal.” (quotation omitted)).
State of Minnesota, Minn. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State v. Eide 898 N.W.2d 290 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Eide 898 N.W.2d 290 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Larson 895 N.W.2d 655 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Larson 895 N.W.2d 655 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Adam John Lilienthal 889 N.W.2d 780 Minn. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Adam John Lilienthal 889 N.W.2d 780 Minn. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Alie Christine Theodore Dorn 887 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Alie Christine Theodore Dorn 887 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 2016
“Mens rea is the element of a crime that requires ‘the defendant know the facts that make [her] conduct illegal.’ ” (quoting Staples v. United States, 511 U.S. 600, 605 (1994)).
State of Minnesota v. Jimmy Clyde Griffin Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Jimmy Clyde Griffin Minn. Ct. App. 2016
d 816, 818-19 (Minn. 2012).
State of Minnesota v. Mark Robert Moser 884 N.W.2d 890 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Mark Robert Moser 884 N.W.2d 890 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
A statute imposes strict liability when it dispenses with mens rea by failing to “require the defendant to know the facts that make his conduct illegal.” d 816, 818 (Minn. 2012) (quoting Staples v. United States, 511 U.S. 600, 605, 114 S. Ct. 1793, 1797 (1994)).
State of Minnesota v. Thomas Joseph Shane 883 N.W.2d 606 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Thomas Joseph Shane 883 N.W.2d 606 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
d 816, 818 (Minn. 2012).
State of Minnesota v. Alie Christine Theodore Dorn 875 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Alie Christine Theodore Dorn 875 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Mens rea is the element of a crime that requires the defendant know the facts that make his conduct illegal.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Hamzeh Daghighian Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Hamzeh Daghighian Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Thomas Wenthe 865 N.W.2d 293 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Thomas Wenthe 865 N.W.2d 293 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jyron Mendale Young Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jyron Mendale Young Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Brian Leonard Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Brian Leonard Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Tommy Salyers, III 858 N.W.2d 156 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Tommy Salyers, III 858 N.W.2d 156 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Stephen Thomas Conlin Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Stephen Thomas Conlin Minn. Ct. App. 2014
The interpretation of a statute is a legal question we review de novo.”
State of Minnesota v. Daniel Joseph Devens 852 N.W.2d 255 Minn. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Daniel Joseph Devens 852 N.W.2d 255 Minn. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Royce Ryan Teague Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Royce Ryan Teague Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(explaining that offenses with “small penalties like fines and short jail sentences .
State v. Wenthe 845 N.W.2d 222 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Wenthe 845 N.W.2d 222 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Garcia-Gutierrez 844 N.W.2d 519 Minn. 2014
State v. Garcia-Gutierrez 844 N.W.2d 519 Minn. 2014
821 (Minn.2012) (holding that possession of a pistol in public requires knowing possession); (holding that the crime of possession of a knife on school grounds requires that the defendant know that he possesses the knife).