Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc., 820 N.W.2d 826.

212 citing documents.

Robert Martin v. A�BULAE, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. N. D. S. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. N. D. S. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In that context, “stare decisis requires that we not overturn our previous construction, now ‘part of the statute as though written therein.’” (quoting Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc., ).
Robert Martin v. A�BULAE, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Appellants contend that “the district court erred as a matter of law when it dismissed [their] unjust enrichment claim.” “Unjust enrichment is an equitable doctrine that allows a plaintiff to recover a benefit conferred upon a defendant when retention of the benefit is not legally justifiable.” Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.
Tony�s Construction v. Kraus-Anderson Construction Company, St. Louis County Schools - ISD 2142 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Tony�s Construction v. Kraus-Anderson Construction Company, St. Louis County Schools - ISD 2142 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Unjust enrichment is an equitable doctrine that allows a plaintiff to recover a benefit conferred upon a defendant when retention of the benefit is not legally justifiable.” Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.
Wolf, Rohr, Gemberling & Allen, P. A. v. Margots Kapacs Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Wolf, Rohr, Gemberling & Allen, P. A. v. Margots Kapacs Minn. Ct. App. 2016
A contract is ambiguous if it is “susceptible to more than one reasonable interpretation.” Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.
Minnesota Joint Underwriting Association v. Jacy, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Minnesota Joint Underwriting Association v. Jacy, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.
Patrick M. Figgins v. Noah Wilcox 879 N.W.2d 653 Minn. 2016
Patrick M. Figgins v. Noah Wilcox 879 N.W.2d 653 Minn. 2016
“The goal of all statutory interpretation is to ‘ascertain and effectuate the intention of the legislature.’ ” Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc., (quoting Minn. Stat. § 645.16 (2014)).
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Joseph Otten, Paul Braun Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Joseph Otten, Paul Braun Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“When the language of a contract is clear and unambiguous, we enforce the agreement of the parties as expressed in the contract.” Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.
Terry L. Gates v. Michael L. Macken Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Terry L. Gates v. Michael L. Macken Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc., -32 (Minn. 2012).
In Re the Matter of the ESTATE OF Brian K. JOHNSON, Decedent 878 N.W.2d 510 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In Re the Matter of the ESTATE OF Brian K. JOHNSON, Decedent 878 N.W.2d 510 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.
Mark Lanterman v. Michael Roman Afremov Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Mark Lanterman v. Michael Roman Afremov Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc., 15 (Minn. 2012).
Leon Asle Baxter v. Debra Kay Baxter Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Leon Asle Baxter v. Debra Kay Baxter Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“We review the language of a contract to determine the intent of the parties.” Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.
Founders Insurance Company v. James Yates 876 N.W.2d 344 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Founders Insurance Company v. James Yates 876 N.W.2d 344 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“[J]udicial construction of a statute becomes part of the statute as though written therein.” Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.
Melrose Gates, LLC v. Chor Moua 875 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 2016
Melrose Gates, LLC v. Chor Moua 875 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 2016
In Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc., we reviewed the district court's dismissal on summary judgment of plaintiffs’ employee wage claims, including an equitable claim for unjust enrichment.
Marjorie Gowan v. The Estate of Robert E. Pape Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Marjorie Gowan v. The Estate of Robert E. Pape Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.
Contractors Edge, Inc. v. City of Mankato Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Contractors Edge, Inc. v. City of Mankato Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.
Soderberg & Vail, LLC v. Meshbesher & Spence, Ltd. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Soderberg & Vail, LLC v. Meshbesher & Spence, Ltd. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Unjust Enrichment “Unjust enrichment is an equitable doctrine that allows a plaintiff to recover a benefit conferred upon a defendant when retention of the benefit is not legally justifiable.” Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Angela Mary Lennartson, Katie Foss 872 N.W.2d 524 Minn. 2015
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Angela Mary Lennartson, Katie Foss 872 N.W.2d 524 Minn. 2015
“[J]udicial construction of a statute becomes part of the statute as though written therein.” Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.
Christina Marshall v. Owen Hoglund, Stephen Hoglund, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Megan Heikes, Integrity Insurance Co., … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Christina Marshall v. Owen Hoglund, Stephen Hoglund, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Megan Heikes, Integrity Insurance Co., … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“When the language of a contract is clear and unambiguous, [an appellate court] enforce[s] the agreement of the parties as expressed in the contract.” Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.
In re the Marriage of: James Allen Ertl v. Diane Martha Ertl 871 N.W.2d 410 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: James Allen Ertl v. Diane Martha Ertl 871 N.W.2d 410 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“We review the language of a contract to determine the intent of the parties.” Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.
In re Petition for Distribution of Attorney's Fees between Stowman Law Firm, P.A., and Lori Peterson Law Firm, … 870 N.W.2d 755 Minn. 2015
In re Petition for Distribution of Attorney's Fees between Stowman Law Firm, P.A., and Lori Peterson Law Firm, … 870 N.W.2d 755 Minn. 2015
Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc., (“[A]ll evidence offered to clarify or explain ambiguous terms .
Todd Anderson v. Patricia Lloyd Minn. Ct. App. 2015
McCullough and Sons, Inc. v. City of Vadnais Heights 868 N.W.2d 721 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Todd Anderson v. Patricia Lloyd Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Unjust enrichment “Unjust enrichment is an equitable doctrine that allows a plaintiff to recover a benefit conferred upon a defendant when retention of the benefit is not legally justifiable.” Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.
McCullough and Sons, Inc. v. City of Vadnais Heights 868 N.W.2d 721 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.
State of Minnesota by Lorie Afremov and Michael R. Afremov v. Anne L. Remes, Martha W. Gabbert Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota by Lorie Afremov and Michael R. Afremov v. Anne L. Remes, Martha W. Gabbert Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.
Kimberlee Ann Nelson v. Lynette Nelson 866 N.W.2d 901 Minn. 2015
Kimberlee Ann Nelson v. Lynette Nelson 866 N.W.2d 901 Minn. 2015
If the plain language of a statute “is clear and free from ambiguity, the court’s role is to enforce the language of the statute and not explore the spirit or purpose of the law.” Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.
Toyota-Lift of Minnesota, Inc. v. American Warehouse Systems, LLC, and third party v. Les Nielsen, third party 868 N.W.2d 689 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Analog Technologies Corp. v. Edward Knutson Minn. Ct. App. 2015