Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc., 820 N.W.2d 826.

212 citing documents.

Ellis v. Doe 924 N.W.2d 258 Minn. 2019
Ellis v. Doe 924 N.W.2d 258 Minn. 2019
Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc. , , 836 (Minn. 2012).
A18-0391 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
to the particular wage claimed.” Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.
Phone Recovery Servs., LLC v. Qwest Corp. 919 N.W.2d 315 Minn. 2018
Phone Recovery Servs., LLC v. Qwest Corp. 919 N.W.2d 315 Minn. 2018
See Christianson v. Henke , , 537 (Minn. 2013) (holding that if we conclude a statute is unambiguous, our role is not to explore its spirit or purpose (citing Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc. , , 836 (Minn. 2012) ) ).
Muschik v. Conner-Muschik 920 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Muschik v. Conner-Muschik 920 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc. , , 836 (Minn. 2012).
Sonja Jeanne Timmons, individually, and as mother and natural guardian of Jadyn Bentlie Haugen, Kaily Marie Timmons and … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc., (“Generally, one who is not a party to a contract has no rights unde r the contract .
Toyota-Lift of Minnesota, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Caldas v. A ffordable Granite & Stone, Inc. , (stating that the Minnesota Payment of Wages Act, Minn. Stat. §§ 181.01-.171 (2016), is intended to “penalize employers that fail to promptly pay their employees’ wages”).
Kremer v. Kremer 912 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 2018
Kremer v. Kremer 912 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 2018
Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc. , , 836 (Minn. 2012).
Christensen Law Office, PLLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
uambe contends that the district court “erred in determining that [he] was liable for unjust enrichment because his rights were determined by the attorney fee agreement.” “Unjust enrichment is an equitable doc trine that allows a plaintiff to recover a benefit conferred upon a defendant when retention of the benefit is not legally justifiable.” Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.
Dewitt v. London Rd. Rental Ctr., Inc. 910 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 2018
Dewitt v. London Rd. Rental Ctr., Inc. 910 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 2018
See Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc. , , 832 (Minn. 2012) (explaining that we review de novo the legal issues of contract interpretation and enforceability).
K & R Landholdings, LLC, d/b/a High Banks Resort, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“When the language of a contract is clear and unambiguous, we enforce the agreement of the parties as expressed in the contract.” Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.
In re the Marriage of: Sonja Vogen Baertsch, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
We interpret contract language “to determine the intent of the parties.” Ertl, d at 415 (quoting Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc., ).
Allan H. Zuehlsdorf, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.
Burt v. Rackner, Inc. 902 N.W.2d 448 Minn. 2017
North Star Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
But, a third party beneficiary “may enforce a prom ise made for his benefit even though he is a stranger both to the contract and the consideration.” Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc., (quotation omitted).
DeWitt v. London Road Rental Center, Inc. 899 N.W.2d 883 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
DeWitt v. London Road Rental Center, Inc. 899 N.W.2d 883 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc., Share Health Plan, (Minn.App.
Poehler v. Cincinnati Insurance Co. 899 N.W.2d 135 Minn. 2017
Poehler v. Cincinnati Insurance Co. 899 N.W.2d 135 Minn. 2017
If we'determine that a statute is clear and unambiguous, our *140 “role is to enforce the language of the statute and not explore the spirit or purpose of the law.” Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone , Inc.
Ouradnik v. Ouradnik 897 N.W.2d 300 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Ouradnik v. Ouradnik 897 N.W.2d 300 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
When our supreme court has previously interpreted a statute, “that interpretation guides us in reviewing subsequent disputes over the meaning of the statute.” Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.
Gilbertson v. Williams Dingmann, LLC 894 N.W.2d 148 Minn. 2017
Gilbertson v. Williams Dingmann, LLC 894 N.W.2d 148 Minn. 2017
See Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc., (“If the language of the statute is clear and free from ambiguity, the court’s role is to énforce the language of the stat *154 ute and not explore the spirit or purpose of the law.”).
Accounts Receivable Services, LLC, as Successor in Interest to Allina Health System, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
When a statute is unambiguous, a “court’s role is to enforce the language of the statute and not explore the spirit or purpose of the law.” Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.
Peterson v. City of Minneapolis 892 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 2017
Peterson v. City of Minneapolis 892 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 2017
at 537 (quoting Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc., ).
In re the Marriage of: Joanna Brooks Benson, f/k/a Joanna Lee Brooks, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone Inc.
James Ariola, as next of kin of, and trustee for, the Estate of Jack Ariola Erenberg, his son, … 889 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
James Ariola, as next of kin of, and trustee for, the Estate of Jack Ariola Erenberg, his son, … 889 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
The goal of statutory interpretation is to “‘ascertain and effectuate the intention of the legislature.’” Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc., d 826, 836 (Minn. 2012) (quoting Minn. Stat. § 645.16 (2010)).
State of Minnesota by its Minnesota Pollution Control Agency v. Diane C. Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota by its Minnesota Pollution Control Agency v. Diane C. Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Contract interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo.” Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.
WAF-2, LLC v. Lowry Building, LLC, and third party v. John R. Rupp, third party Minn. Ct. App. 2016
U. S. Bank National Association, as trustee, successor-in-interest to Bank of America, N.A., as trustee, successor to Wells … 888 N.W.2d 699 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
WAF-2, LLC v. Lowry Building, LLC, and third party v. John R. Rupp, third party Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.
U. S. Bank National Association, as trustee, successor-in-interest to Bank of America, N.A., as trustee, successor to Wells … 888 N.W.2d 699 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone Inc.
U. S. Bank National Association, as trustee, successor-in-interest to Bank of America, N.A., as trustee, successor to Wells … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
U. S. Bank National Association, as trustee, successor-in-interest to Bank of America, N.A., as trustee, successor to Wells … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone Inc.
Robert Allen Taylor Company v. United Credit Recovery, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, US Bancorp, a Delaware … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Robert Allen Taylor Company v. United Credit Recovery, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, US Bancorp, a Delaware … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
D. Unjust-Enrichment Claim “Unjust enrichment is an equitable doctrine that allows a plaintiff to recover a benefit conferred upon a defendant when retention of the benefit is not legally justifiable.” Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.
Toyota-Lift of Minnesota, Inc. v. American Warehouse Systems, LLC v. Les Nielsen 886 N.W.2d 208 Minn. 2016
Toyota-Lift of Minnesota, Inc. v. American Warehouse Systems, LLC v. Les Nielsen 886 N.W.2d 208 Minn. 2016
Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc., ().
Todd Johnson v. Britta K. Anderson, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Donnabelle M. Johnson, decedent Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Todd Johnson v. Britta K. Anderson, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Donnabelle M. Johnson, decedent Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.
Reichel Investments, L.P. v. Craig A. Reichel Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Reichel Investments, L.P. v. Craig A. Reichel Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by