Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Frandsen v. Ford Motor Co., 801 N.W.2d 177.

38 citing documents.

VH-Minneapolis South Inc v. TGI Friday's Inc., Akaashaman LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2025
VH-Minneapolis South Inc v. TGI Friday's Inc., Akaashaman LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Dawn M. Simonson, Respondent, vs. Douglas County, and Minnesota Counties Intergovernmental Trust, Relators Minn. 2025
Dawn M. Simonson, Respondent, vs. Douglas County, and Minnesota Counties Intergovernmental Trust, Relators Minn. 2025
The WCCA concluded that the proper burden of proof is that of a
L and T Tree Services, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company v. Daniel J. Andersen, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
L and T Tree Services, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company v. Daniel J. Andersen, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
6 L&T correctly observes that some of the cases addressing this issue arose after 6 L&T also argues that, under the general-waiver doctrine, depositing the check was not an “intentional relinquishment of a known right.”
In re the Marriage of: Ajay K. Israni, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
3 (2020); see Frandsen v. Ford Motor Co. , (noting that “shall” is mandatory).
Faith Technologies, Inc., Respondent, Biosar America, LLC, Respondent, Frattalone Companies, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(“Waiver is the intentional relinquishment of a known right.”).
In re the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Frandsen v. Fo rd Motor Co.
In re the Matter of: Minn. 2019
.” –94 (Minn. 1952); (noting that a rebuttable presumption is “a legal inference or assumption that a fact exists”) (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
Peterson v. W. Nat'l Mut. Ins. Co. 930 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Peterson v. W. Nat'l Mut. Ins. Co. 930 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Frandsen v. Ford Motor Co. , , 181 (Minn. 2011).
Manor Warehouse & Delivery, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“To establish a waiver or ratification of fraud, there must be evidence that the waiving party had full knowledge of the facts and his or her legal rights, and intended to relinquish these rights.” Carpenter, d at 262; see also Frandsen v. Ford Motor Co. , ( “Waiver is the intentional relinquishment of a known right.”).
In the Matter of Larissa Michele Hansen on behalf of Minor Child, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A “waiver is the intentional relinquishment of a known right .” Frandsen v. Ford Motor Co. , .
St. Jude Medical, Inc. v. Carter 899 N.W.2d 869 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
St. Jude Medical, Inc. v. Carter 899 N.W.2d 869 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, ex rel. Anthony Alan Early v. Tom Roy, Commissioner of Corrections Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota, ex rel. Anthony Alan Early v. Tom Roy, Commissioner of Corrections Minn. Ct. App. 2016
John Wilbur v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company 880 N.W.2d 874 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
John Wilbur v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company 880 N.W.2d 874 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jennifer L. DeCook, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. Olmsted Medical Center, Kenneth M. Palmer, M.D., Jack F. Perrone, M.D., Ashley Morrow Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jennifer L. DeCook, Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. Olmsted Medical Center, Kenneth M. Palmer, M.D., Jack F. Perrone, M.D., Ashley Morrow Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Bjorklund Companies, LLC v. Auto-Owners Insurance Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Bjorklund Companies, LLC v. Auto-Owners Insurance Minn. Ct. App. 2015
James W. Stevens, Relator v. S.T. Services and CNA Insurance Companies 851 N.W.2d 52 Minn. 2014
James W. Stevens, Relator v. S.T. Services and CNA Insurance Companies 851 N.W.2d 52 Minn. 2014
because we decided Frandsen on the merits even though it involved a petition to discontinue the benefits of an employee who had been adjudicated permanently totally disabled under an award on stipulation.
State ex rel. Swanson v. 3M Co. 845 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 2014
State ex rel. Swanson v. 3M Co. 845 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 2014
White v. City of Elk River 840 N.W.2d 43 Minn. 2013
Safety Signs, LLC v. Niles-Wiese Construction Co. 840 N.W.2d 34 Minn. 2013
White v. City of Elk River 840 N.W.2d 43 Minn. 2013
Safety Signs, LLC v. Niles-Wiese Construction Co. 840 N.W.2d 34 Minn. 2013
State v. R.H.B. 821 N.W.2d 817 Minn. 2012
State v. R.H.B. 821 N.W.2d 817 Minn. 2012
Patino v. One 2007 Chevrolet, VIN 1GNFC16017J255427, Texas License Plate 578VYH 821 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 2012
Patino v. One 2007 Chevrolet, VIN 1GNFC16017J255427, Texas License Plate 578VYH 821 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 2012
In re the Welfare of the Child of E.A.C. 812 N.W.2d 165 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
In re the Welfare of the Child of E.A.C. 812 N.W.2d 165 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
When applying a statute’s plain language, we take care “to avoid absurd results and unjust consequences.” (quotation omitted).