Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Nelson, 812 N.W.2d 184.

44 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
First, a person who is required to register must “give advance notice of the new primary address to which the person plans to move, ” at least five days before the person starts living there, “to the assigned corrections agent or to the law-enforcement authority with which the person currently is registered.” see also Minn. Stat. § 243.166, subd.
State of Minnesota v. Lakeric Cortez McCaskill Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Lakeric Cortez McCaskill Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
We 4 must assume that “the jury believed the state’s witnesses and disbelieved any evidence to the contrary.” State v. Nelson , (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Yahye Elmi Abdisalan Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Yahye Elmi Abdisalan Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Kevin Herman Larson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Kevin Herman Larson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Patrick James Buswell Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Patrick James Buswell Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“We will not disturb the verdict if the jury, acting with due regard for the presumption of innocence and the requirement of proof beyond a reasonable doubt, could reasonably conclude that the defendant was proven guilty of the offense charged.” (quotations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Rafael Alfonso Banks 875 N.W.2d 338 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Rafael Alfonso Banks 875 N.W.2d 338 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Ronald Clark, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ronald Clark, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Brandon James Schroeder Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Brandon James Schroeder Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Scott Randall Baynes Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Scott Randall Baynes Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“We will not disturb the verdict if the [fact-finder], acting with due regard for the presumption of innocence and the requirement of proof beyond a reasonable doubt, could reasonably conclude that the defendant was proven guilty of the offense charged.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Momat Ali Jagne Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Momat Ali Jagne Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“We will not disturb the verdict if the jury, acting with due regard for the presumption of innocence and the requirement of proof beyond a reasonable doubt, could reasonably conclude that the defendant was proven guilty of the offense charged.”
State of Minnesota v. Alfonzo Benjamin Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Alfonzo Benjamin Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Eddie Niles Hubbard Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Paul Martin Hippler Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Eddie Niles Hubbard Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Paul Martin Hippler Minn. Ct. App. 2015
10 “When considering a claim of insufficient evidence, this court conducts a painstaking analysis of the record to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the conviction, is sufficient to allow the jurors to reach the verdict that they did.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Keon Malone Mangun Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Keon Malone Mangun Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Kevon Deonte Lewis-Ferguson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Kevon Deonte Lewis-Ferguson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Donald Robert Edwardson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Donald Robert Edwardson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Rafael O'Toole Watson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Rafael O'Toole Watson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Justin Lee Niesen Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Justin Lee Niesen Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Sufficiency of evidence “When considering a claim of insufficient evidence, this court conducts a painstaking analysis of the record to determine whether the evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the conviction, is sufficient to allow the jurors to reach the verdict that they did.” (quotation 9 omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Jason Paul Krieg Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Jason Paul Krieg Minn. Ct. App. 2014

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by