Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Andersen v. State, 830 N.W.2d 1.

316 citing documents.

A16-1196 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
We ordinarily “give trial counsel wide latitude to determ ine the best strategy for the client.” (stating “[w]e will generally not review an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim that is based on trial strategy” and that “[t]he extent of trial counsel’s investigation is considered part of trial strategy”).
Raymond Joseph Traylor, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
d 1, 10 (Minn. 2013) (requiring for viable ine ffective-assistance-of-counsel claim that “a reasonable probability exists that the outcome would have been different but for counsel’s errors”).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
that a reasonable pro bability exists that the outcome would have been different but for counsel’s errors.” Andersen v. State
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
The Confrontation Clause prohibits “the admission of testimonial out -of-court statements” unless: (1) “the declarant is unavailable,” and (2) “the defendant had a prior opportunity to cross-examine the declarant.” Andersen v. State , (citing Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 68, 124 S. Ct. 1354, 1374 (2004)).
A17-0231 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
However, “[w] e will generally not review an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim that is based on trial strategy.”
State v. Larsen 901 N.W.2d 433 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Larsen 901 N.W.2d 433 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In evaluating claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, we note that “there is a strong presumption that counsel’s performance was reasonable.”
State v. Ellis-Strong 899 N.W.2d 531 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Ellis-Strong 899 N.W.2d 531 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
But, “[w]hen a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel can be determined on the basis of the trial record, the claim must be brought on direct appeal.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
This court will “not review an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim that is based on trial strategy.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A16-0880 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
To sustain a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show that “(1) his counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, and (2) that a reasonable probability exists that the outcome would have been different but for cou nsel’s errors.”
State of Minnesota v. Edward Antonio Zappa Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Edward Antonio Zappa Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(citing Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 68, 124 S. Ct. 1354, 1374 (2004)).
Steven Lynn Oppel v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Terry Lee West Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Terry Lee West Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(citing Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 68, 124 S. Ct. 1354, 1374 (2004)).
Steven Lynn Oppel v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Wiggins v. Smith, 123 S. Ct. 2527, 2537, 539 U.S. 510, 526 (2003); (describing issues categorized as trial strategy).
State of Minnesota v. Earl Lionell Ward Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Earl Lionell Ward Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(holding that, if the trial record is sufficient for analyzing an 9 ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim, defendant must bring the claim on direct appeal or it will be Knaffla-barred in future proceedings).
Enamidem Celestine Okon v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Enamidem Celestine Okon v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Michael David Kochevar Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Luis Gerardo Garcia Urbano v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Luis Gerardo Garcia Urbano v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“We need not address both the performance and prejudice prongs if one is dispositive.”
State of Minnesota v. Michael David Kochevar Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Mark William Latimer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Mark William Latimer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Ronald Casa Roby Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Ronald Casa Roby Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“We will generally not review an ineffective- assistance-of-counsel claim that is based on trial strategy.” d 1, 10 (Minn. 2013).
State of Minnesota v. Wyatt Morris Howard Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Alvin Lee Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Alvin Lee Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Wyatt Morris Howard Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In considering the second prong of the Strickland test, “[t]he reviewing court considers the totality of the evidence before the judge or jury.”
State of Minnesota v. Vincent Walker Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Vincent Walker Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Appellate courts “will generally not review an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim that is based on trial strategy.”
Derrick Trevor Griffin v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 282 Minn. 2016
Derrick Trevor Griffin v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 282 Minn. 2016
5 interests of fairness and justice warrant relief.”
Randy Leeroyal Swaney v. State of Minnesota 882 N.W.2d 207 Minn. 2016
Randy Leeroyal Swaney v. State of Minnesota 882 N.W.2d 207 Minn. 2016
Jonathan Nicholas Turner v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jonathan Nicholas Turner v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Aloeng Kelly Vang, A14-1574 881 N.W.2d 551 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Aloeng Kelly Vang, A14-1574 881 N.W.2d 551 Minn. 2016
“[T]here is a strong presumption that counsel’s performance was reasonable.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: M. A. K. and A. L. P., Sr., … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: M. A. K. and A. L. P., Sr., … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“In evaluating claims of ineffective 19 assistance of counsel, there is a strong presumption that counsel’s performance was reasonable.”
Tracy Alan Zornes v. State of Minnesota 880 N.W.2d 363 Minn. 2016
Tracy Alan Zornes v. State of Minnesota 880 N.W.2d 363 Minn. 2016
Izell Wright Robinson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016