Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. M.D.T., 831 N.W.2d 276.

68 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. E. M. L. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. E. M. L. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Counsel acknowledged that, in light of the Minnesota Supreme Court’s appellant was limited to requesting expungement of judicial-branch records.
Grant County Social Services, Natasha Kaiser, OBO A.C.R., Ward of the Commissioner of the State of MN v. … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Grant County Social Services, Natasha Kaiser, OBO A.C.R., Ward of the Commissioner of the State of MN v. … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Mahdi Hassan Ali 855 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Mahdi Hassan Ali 855 N.W.2d 235 Minn. 2014
Third, a court has inherent judicial authority to engage in activities that are necessary to the performance of judicial functions, but “the judiciary is not to resort to inherent authority when doing so would not ‘respect the equally unique authority of another branch of government.” 282 (Minn.2013) ().
In Re the GUARDIANSHIP OF Jeffers J. TSCHUMY, Ward 853 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 2014
State of Minnesota, Commissioner of Human Services v. S. A. D. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota, Commissioner of Human Services v. S. A. D. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Charles F. Bond v. American Select Insurance Management Corporation, a Florida corporation, Timothy J. Pawlik Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Charles F. Bond v. American Select Insurance Management Corporation, a Florida corporation, Timothy J. Pawlik Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“The judiciary’s inherent power governs that which is essential to the existence, dignity, and function of a court because it is a court.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Bruce Martin 849 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Bruce Martin 849 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Furthermore, the supreme court has articulated the criteria for determining whether a district court may expunge criminal records pursuant to inherent judicial authority, which exists only if “the relief requested by the court or aggrieved party is necessary to the performance of the judicial function as contemplated in our state constitution.” (quotation omitted).
Roman Nose v. State 845 N.W.2d 193 Minn. 2014
State v. Castillo-Alvarez 836 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 2013
State v. A.S.E. 835 N.W.2d 513 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. A.S.E. 835 N.W.2d 513 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
In re the Welfare of J.J.P. 831 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 2013