Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. M.D.T., 831 N.W.2d 276.

68 citing documents.

A25-0013 A25-0014 A25-0015 Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Sela Investments, Ltd LLP v. J. H. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Sela Investments, Ltd LLP v. J. H. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
This authority extends to expungement of court records when it is “necessary to the performance of the judicial functions.” (quotations 6 omitted).
In the Matter of the Welfare of: C.J.C. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Welfare of: C.J.C. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Duluth, MN, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Buckner v. Robichaud, ___ N.W.2d ___, ___, 2023 WL 4340153, at *3 (Minn. July 5, 2023)
Allison Catherine Buckner, Minn. 2023
The origin of the “judicia[ry’s] power in Minnesota is our state constitution.” d 276, 280 (Minn. 2013).
John Joseph Wawersich, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Jeffrey S. Sheridan, et al., Minn. 2021
(Stras, J., concurring) (looking to the “widely understood meaning” of a constitutional provision at the time it was ratified).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
-83 (Minn. 2013); see also Minn. Stat. § 645.16 (“When the words of a law in their application to an existing situation are clear and free from all ambiguity, the letter of the law shall not be disregarded under the pretext of pursuing the spirit.”).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. C. and J. J. A. L., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Discover Bank, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A19-1223 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Minn. Stat. §§ 609A.01-.04 (2018)
James Salvatore Bergman, Minn. 2020
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Bergman v. Caulk 931 N.W.2d 114 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota, Commissioner of Human Services, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
4 A court may use its inherent authority to expunge criminal records when (1) “the petitioner’s constitutional rights may be seriously infringed by retention of [the] records” or (2) “when expungement is necessary to the performance of judicial functions.” -81 (Minn. 2013) (quotations omitted).
At Home Apartments, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(“The unfairness issue we discussed in C.A.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Ambaye , 616 (stating that this court reviews a district court’s exercise of its inherent authority to expunge criminal records for abuse of di scretion).
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
giving de novo review to issues of statutory interpretation.
A17-0729 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. M. J. R. D. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. M. J. R. D. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Ramsey County, City of St. Paul v. R. M. W. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. A. K. N. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. A. K. N. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota, Ramsey County, City of St. Paul v. R. M. W. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In Re the Matter of: Anne Ray Charitable Trust, a Minnesota charitable trust, under agreement dated August 20, … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In Re the Matter of: Anne Ray Charitable Trust, a Minnesota charitable trust, under agreement dated August 20, … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. J. E. H. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. J. E. H. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of: P. J. S. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of: P. J. S. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. A. D. B. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. A. D. B. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(stating that the judicial branch’s inherent authority includes the criminal 8 expungement of records when it is necessary to the performance of judicial functions).
In re Craig E. Cascarano, State of Minnesota v. Michael Demond Rashaun Mason 871 N.W.2d 34 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re Craig E. Cascarano, State of Minnesota v. Michael Demond Rashaun Mason 871 N.W.2d 34 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. C. H. T. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. C. H. T. Minn. Ct. App. 2015