Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Amos Graves v. Michael Wayman, First Minnesota Bank, 859 N.W.2d 791.

27 citing documents.

Wilmington Trust, National Association, Gregg Williams v. 700 HENNEPIN HOLDINGS, LLC, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Wilmington Trust, National Association, Gregg Williams v. 700 HENNEPIN HOLDINGS, LLC, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
If a statute is unambiguous, we “interpret the words and phrases in the statute according to their plain and ordinary meanings.”
Mark Lukens, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“Rescission is the unmaking or abrogation of a contract.” (quotations omitted).
James Dennis Omwenga, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
NewGen contends that Omwenga was “not entitled to the equitable relief of rescission.” “Rescission is the unmaking or abrogation of a contract.” (quotations omitted).
Petition of Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for an Order Directing Entry of New Certificate of Title After Mortgage … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“It is well established under Minnesota law that when a grantor has no power to convey land due to a void deed, the purchaser does not acquire title, and it is immaterial whether [the purchaser] was a bona fide purchaser or not.” d 791, 801 (Minn. 2015) (quotations omitted).
In the Matter of Stevens County for a Conditional Use Permit. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
If something is “void,” it is “null” or “of no legal effect,” whereas if something is “voidable” 17 it is “valid until annulled” and “capable of being affirmed or rejected at the option of one of the parties.” Black’s Law Dictionary 1885 (defining “void”), 1886 (defining “voidable”) (11th ed. 2019); (Dietzen, J., dissenting) (discussing distinction between “void” and “voidable” transactions).
Sorchaga v. Ride Auto, LLC 909 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 2018
Sorchaga v. Ride Auto, LLC 909 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 2018
See Graves v. Wayman , , 811-12 (Minn. 2015) ; Hatch v. Kulick , 211 Minn. 309 , , 360 (1941).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
If a statute is unambiguous, we “interpret the words and phrases in the statute according to their plain and ordinary meanings.”
City of Grant, by and through its City Clerk, Kim Points, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Joanna Brooks Benson, f/k/a Joanna Lee Brooks, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
If a statute is unambiguous, we “interpret the words and phrases in the statute according to their plain and ordinary meanings.”
U. S. Bank National Association, as trustee, successor-in-interest to Bank of America, N.A., as trustee, successor to Wells … 888 N.W.2d 699 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
U. S. Bank National Association, as trustee, successor-in-interest to Bank of America, N.A., as trustee, successor to Wells … 888 N.W.2d 699 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
If a statute is unambiguous, we “interpret the words and phrases in the statute according to their plain and ordinary meanings.”
U. S. Bank National Association, as trustee, successor-in-interest to Bank of America, N.A., as trustee, successor to Wells … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
U. S. Bank National Association, as trustee, successor-in-interest to Bank of America, N.A., as trustee, successor to Wells … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
If a statute is unambiguous, we “interpret the words and phrases in the statute according to their plain and ordinary meanings.”
State of Minnesota v. Angela Tharnaa Hooks Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Angela Tharnaa Hooks Minn. Ct. App. 2016
If a statute is unambiguous, we “interpret the words and phrases in the statute according to their plain and ordinary meanings.”
Jason Daniel Gustafson, Relator v. Commissioner of Human Services 884 N.W.2d 674 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jason Daniel Gustafson, Relator v. Commissioner of Human Services 884 N.W.2d 674 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
If a statute is unambiguous, we “interpret the words and phrases in the statute according to their plain and ordinary meanings.”
In the Matter of a Petition for Clarification of an Appropriate Unit Independent School District No. 622, North … 880 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of a Petition for Clarification of an Appropriate Unit Independent School District No. 622, North … 880 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
If a statute is unambiguous, we “interpret the words and phrases in the statute according to their plain 6 and ordinary meanings.”
Ronald D. Van Riper v. Bonnie L. Roy Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Ronald D. Van Riper v. Bonnie L. Roy Minn. Ct. App. 2016
And the purpose of recording property interests is generally to protect those who might later seek an interest in it, not the parties to the transaction that created the recordable interest.
In the Matter of the Trust Agreement of Eugene L. Johnson u/t/a dated December 22, 2008. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Trust Agreement of Eugene L. Johnson u/t/a dated December 22, 2008. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The district court concluded that an order was necessary “to resolve factual and legal disputes.” Because manifestation of intent to deliver a deed is usually a question of fact, and because the record supports Bradley Johnson’s assertion that Donna Mae and Eugene executed quit-claim deeds conveying property interest to the trust, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by finding that the petition for instructions was properly brought.
Kenneth A. Roseland v. Joseph A. Wentzell, Attorney at Law, Richard L. Kusick, and Roseland Acres, LLC, third … 864 N.W.2d 356 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Kenneth A. Roseland v. Joseph A. Wentzell, Attorney at Law, Richard L. Kusick, and Roseland Acres, LLC, third … 864 N.W.2d 356 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
.” d 791, 797 (Minn. 2015).