Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Riley v. State, 819 N.W.2d 162.

475 citing documents.

Denis Alcivar Alvarado-Riera v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A postconviction court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted); see also Colbert v. State, 870 N.W2d 616, 621 (Minn. 2015).
State of Minnesota v. Randy Joseph Fellman Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Randy Joseph Fellman Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Ricky Donell Holifield Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Timothy Ayman Bakdash v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Timothy Ayman Bakdash v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Ricky Donell Holifield Minn. Ct. App. 2016
This court reviews the “denial of a petition for postconviction relief, as well as a request for an evidentiary hearing, for an abuse of discretion.”
Brian Keith Hooper v. State of Minnesota 888 N.W.2d 138 Minn. 2016
Brian Keith Hooper v. State of Minnesota 888 N.W.2d 138 Minn. 2016
Marcus Allen Brown v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Marcus Allen Brown v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Charles Kwadzo Sokpa-Anku v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Michael David Kochevar Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Michael David Kochevar Minn. Ct. App. 2016
A postconviction court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (citations and quotations omitted).
Charles Kwadzo Sokpa-Anku v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“We review a denial of a petition for postconviction relief, as well as a request for an evidentiary hearing, for an abuse of discretion.” (citations omitted).
Aaron Joseph Morrow v. State of Minnesota 886 N.W.2d 204 Minn. 2016
Aaron Joseph Morrow v. State of Minnesota 886 N.W.2d 204 Minn. 2016
We review the “denial of a petition for postconviction relief, as well as a request for an evidentiary hearing, for an abuse of discretion.”
LaQuinn Jamul Williams v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
LaQuinn Jamul Williams v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Kim Thul Ouk v. State of Minnesota 884 N.W.2d 392 Minn. 2016
Kim Thul Ouk v. State of Minnesota 884 N.W.2d 392 Minn. 2016
Patrick Samuel Meszaros v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Charlie Junior Pryor v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
James Donald Dahl v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Patrick Samuel Meszaros v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Charlie Junior Pryor v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
James Donald Dahl v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Lane Francis Weitzel v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 2016
Lane Francis Weitzel v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 2016
Dwayne Lee Wright v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jamal Abdi Madar v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jamal Abdi Madar v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“All five criteria must be satisfied to obtain relief.” d 162, 168 (Minn. 2012).
Dwayne Lee Wright v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Prentis Cordell Jackson v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 272 Minn. 2016
Derrick Trevor Griffin v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 282 Minn. 2016
Derrick Trevor Griffin v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 282 Minn. 2016
Prentis Cordell Jackson v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 272 Minn. 2016
is ¡ against logic and the facts in the record.’ ” ().
Jason Mark Musburger v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jason Mark Musburger v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Calvin Boswell, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jamillo Dante Spight v. State of Minnesota, A15-2007 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Michael William Kirby Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Calvin Boswell, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jamillo Dante Spight v. State of Minnesota, A15-2007 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“All five criteria must be satisfied to obtain relief.”
State of Minnesota v. Michael William Kirby Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Michael Delaney Harris v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jonathan Nicholas Turner v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jonathan Nicholas Turner v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“We review a denial of a petition for postconviction relief, as well as a request for an evidentiary hearing, for an abuse of discretion.”
Michael Delaney Harris v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
DECISION “[Appellate courts] review a denial of a petition for postconviction relief, as well as a request for an evidentiary hearing, for an abuse of discretion.”
State of Minnesota v. Aloeng Kelly Vang, A14-1574 881 N.W.2d 551 Minn. 2016