Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Riley v. State, 819 N.W.2d 162.

476 citing documents.

Wayne v. State 912 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 2018
Riley v. State , , 167 (Minn. 2012).
State of Minnesota v. Taylor James Pass, and Taylor James Pass, vs. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Jesse Albert Jones v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2018
David Walt Studanski v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“A postconviction court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).
Paul Miguel Engen v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2018
4 v. State, (quotation omitted).
Gideon Charles Arrington, II v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“A postconviction court abuses its discretion when its decision is ba sed on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” d 162, 167 (Minn. 2012) (quotation omitted).
Wendy Sue Littlewolf v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A postconviction court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (citations and quotation omitted) (noting that we review findings of fact “under a clearly erroneous standard” and “legal conclusions de novo”).
Peter Louis John v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“A postconviction court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotatio n omitted).
Keith Henderson, Minn. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Andrew Albert Comeaux Minn. Ct. App. 2018
d 162, 167 (Minn. 2012).
State of Minnesota v. Andre Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A postconviction court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotations omitted).
Amecio Navro Enge v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Riley v. State , see also Minn. Stat. § 590.01, subd.
Wilson Nduri Tindi v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A postconviction court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is agains t logic and the facts in the record.” (citations and quotations omitted).
Raymond Joseph Traylor v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A postconviction court abuses its discretion when its decision is 4 based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).
Gary Lee Johnson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Andrew James Gibbons v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A postconviction court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (citations and quotations omitted).
Lapenotiere v. State 902 N.W.2d 464 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Lapenotiere v. State 902 N.W.2d 464 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Carlos Orlando Olivas-Varela v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Adalberto Sevilla v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A postconviction court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).
State v. Stempfley 900 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 2017
A15-1255 Minn. 2017
(“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (citing Riley v. State , )).
State of Minnesota v. Eric J. Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2017
An abuse of discretion occurs when the postconviction court’s “decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).
Sharon Marie O’Boyle v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Clayton James Hanks v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“An evidentiary hearing on a petition is mandated whenever material facts are in dispute which have not been resolved in the proceedings resulting in conviction and which must be resolved in order to determine the issues raised on the merits.” Riley v. State , (quotation omitted).
Brown v. State 895 N.W.2d 612 Minn. 2017
Brown v. State 895 N.W.2d 612 Minn. 2017
A16-0648 Minn. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Lynette Marie Robbins Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A postconviction court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).
Michelle Rae Wilson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Joseph Milton Barnes Respondent v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Mosley 895 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 2017
State v. Mosley 895 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 2017
ANALYSIS “We review a denial of a petition for postconviction relief, as well as a request for an evidentiary hearing, for an abuse of discretion.”
State v. Guzman 892 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 2017
State v. Guzman 892 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 2017
Milton Joseph Budreau, III v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Ronnie Jerome Jackson, III v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Otis Rodney Elder, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Francisco Herrera Sanchez v. State of Minnesota 890 N.W.2d 716 Minn. 2017
Francisco Herrera Sanchez v. State of Minnesota 890 N.W.2d 716 Minn. 2017
“A postconviction court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
Ravy Nov v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Ravy Nov v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A postconviction court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).
Freddie James Prewitt v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Freddie James Prewitt v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Steven Lynn Oppel v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Steven Lynn Oppel v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Jetaun Helen Wheeler v. State of Minnesota 889 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Jetaun Helen Wheeler v. State of Minnesota 889 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“We review the ‘denial of a petition for postconviction relief, as well as a request for an evidentiary hearing, for an abuse of discretion.’” ().
Kenneth Jerome Brunner v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Kenneth Jerome Brunner v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by