Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Riley v. State, 819 N.W.2d 162.

475 citing documents.

A17-1750 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Jesse Albert Jones, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
David Walt Studanski, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“A postconviction court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).
Paul Miguel Engen, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
4 v. State, (quotation omitted).
Gideon Charles Arrington, II, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“A postconviction court abuses its discretion when its decision is ba sed on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” d 162, 167 (Minn. 2012) (quotation omitted).
Wendy Sue Littlewolf, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A postconviction court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (citations and quotation omitted) (noting that we review findings of fact “under a clearly erroneous standard” and “legal conclusions de novo”).
Peter Louis John, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“A postconviction court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotatio n omitted).
Keith Henderson, Minn. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
d 162, 167 (Minn. 2012).
A16-1196 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A postconviction court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotations omitted).
Amecio Navro Enge, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Riley v. State , see also Minn. Stat. § 590.01, subd.
Wilson Nduri Tindi, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A postconviction court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is agains t logic and the facts in the record.” (citations and quotations omitted).
Raymond Joseph Traylor, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A postconviction court abuses its discretion when its decision is 4 based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).
Gary Lee Johnson, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Andrew James Gibbons, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A postconviction court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (citations and quotations omitted).
Lapenotiere v. State 902 N.W.2d 464 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Lapenotiere v. State 902 N.W.2d 464 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Carlos Orlando Olivas-Varela, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Adalberto Sevilla, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A postconviction court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).
State v. Stempfley 900 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 2017
A15-1255 Minn. 2017
(“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (citing Riley v. State , )).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
An abuse of discretion occurs when the postconviction court’s “decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).
Sharon Marie O’Boyle, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Clayton James Hanks, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“An evidentiary hearing on a petition is mandated whenever material facts are in dispute which have not been resolved in the proceedings resulting in conviction and which must be resolved in order to determine the issues raised on the merits.” Riley v. State , (quotation omitted).
Brown v. State 895 N.W.2d 612 Minn. 2017
Brown v. State 895 N.W.2d 612 Minn. 2017
A16-0648 Minn. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A postconviction court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).
Michelle Rae Wilson, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Joseph Milton Barnes, petitioner Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Mosley 895 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 2017
State v. Mosley 895 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 2017
ANALYSIS “We review a denial of a petition for postconviction relief, as well as a request for an evidentiary hearing, for an abuse of discretion.”
State v. Guzman 892 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 2017
State v. Guzman 892 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 2017
Milton Joseph Budreau, III, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Ronnie Jerome Jackson, III, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Otis Rodney Elder, Jr., petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Francisco Herrera Sanchez v. State of Minnesota 890 N.W.2d 716 Minn. 2017
Francisco Herrera Sanchez v. State of Minnesota 890 N.W.2d 716 Minn. 2017
“A postconviction court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
Ravy Nov v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Ravy Nov v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A postconviction court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).
Freddie James Prewitt v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Freddie James Prewitt v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Steven Lynn Oppel v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Steven Lynn Oppel v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Jetaun Helen Wheeler v. State of Minnesota 889 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Jetaun Helen Wheeler v. State of Minnesota 889 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“We review the ‘denial of a petition for postconviction relief, as well as a request for an evidentiary hearing, for an abuse of discretion.’” ().
Kenneth Jerome Brunner v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Kenneth Jerome Brunner v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Denis Alcivar Alvarado-Riera v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017