Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Coker v. Jesson, 831 N.W.2d 483.

81 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Wayne Joseph Averett Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-91 (Minn. 2013).1 “Instead, the Appeal Panel is required to view the evidence produced [by petitioner] in a light most favorable to the committed person.” Id.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Joseph Edwin Harju Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Leah Christina Graeber Minn. Ct. App. 2017
P. 41.02(b); -91 (Minn. 2013) (holding that other provisions of rule 41.02(b) do not apply to proceedings before judicial appeal panel because of conflict with section 253B.19, subdivision 2(d)).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Donald Dean Christiansen Minn. Ct. App. 2017
2(d) (2016); Coker v. Jesson , -86 (Minn. 2013).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Steven Merrill Hogy Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Steven Merrill Hogy Minn. Ct. App. 2017
The petitioner must “come forward only with sufficient, competent evidence that, if proven, would entitle the petitioner to relief.”
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Jesse L. Lee f/k/a Dennis L. Wiesinger Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Jesse L. Lee f/k/a Dennis L. Wiesinger Minn. Ct. App. 2017
The proceeding in which a committed person produces evidence is commonly referred to as a “first-phase hearing.”
David Leroy Gamble v. Emily Johnson Piper, Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2016
David Leroy Gamble v. Emily Johnson Piper, Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2016
This is “only a burden of production.”
State of Minnesota v. Alphonse Reff, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Alphonse Reff, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
However, “a trier of fact is free to accept part and reject part of a witness’s testimony.”
James Adam Roth v. Emily Johnson Piper, Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2016
James Adam Roth v. Emily Johnson Piper, Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2016
This is “only a burden of production.”
A15-1606 Christopher R. Coker (A15-1439, A15-1445) (A15-1606) v. Emily Johnson Piper, Commissioner of Human Services (A15-1439) (A15-1606), Hennepin … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
A15-1606 Christopher R. Coker (A15-1439, A15-1445) (A15-1606) v. Emily Johnson Piper, Commissioner of Human Services (A15-1439) (A15-1606), Hennepin … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Coker v. Jesson (Coker II)
Robert A. Kunshier v. Emily Johnson Piper, Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Robert A. Kunshier v. Emily Johnson Piper, Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2016
2(d) (2014); (stating that “[t]he proceeding in which a committed person produces evidence is commonly referred to as a ‘first-phase hearing’”).
Joel Gary Borchardt v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Joel Gary Borchardt v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(reversing a decision based on the application of the wrong burden and remanding for the application of the correct burden).
Ricky Lee McDeid v. Lucinda Jesson, Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ricky Lee McDeid v. Lucinda Jesson, Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2015
for support of his argument that the commissioner’s exhibits should not have been admitted into evidence.
Joseph Anthony Favors v. Lucinda E. Jesson, Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Joseph Anthony Favors v. Lucinda E. Jesson, Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Stephen G. Spartz v. Lucinda E. Jesson, Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Stephen G. Spartz v. Lucinda E. Jesson, Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Bradley Wayne Foster v. Lucinda Jesson, Commissioner of Human Services 857 N.W.2d 545 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-90 (Minn. 2013) (citing State ex rel.
Dezeray Marie Roblero-Barrios v. Lucinda Jesson, Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Dezeray Marie Roblero-Barrios v. Lucinda Jesson, Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2014
This is “only a burden of production.”
Larson v. Jesson 847 N.W.2d 531 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Larson v. Jesson 847 N.W.2d 531 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(noting that “the standards for directing a verdict [under Minn. R. Civ.