Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Haugen v. Superior Development, Inc., 819 N.W.2d 715.

28 citing documents.

Jeffrey Zoss, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Haugen v. Superior Dev., Inc., 1 A good reason is one “(1) that is directly related to the employment and for which the employer is responsible; (2) that is adverse to the worker; and (3) that would compel an average, reasonable worker to quit and become unemployed rather than remaining in the employment.” Minn. Stat. §
Naomi Campbell, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Haugen v. Superior Dev., Inc., -23 (Minn. App. 2012).
Mary Chasteen, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See Thao, 8 d at 11; (remanding for a determination whether a reduction in hours was adverse); Haugen v. Superior Dev., Inc., (“[C]aselaw consistently establishes that a substantial wage or hours reduction is good reason to quit.”).
Ann R. Majerus, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Specifically , she relies on Thao v. Command Ctr., Inc. , Sunstar Foods Inc. v. Uhlendorf , ; Scott v. Photo Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 535, and Haugen v. Superior Dev., Inc., .
Edward Wrazidlo, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Cf. Haugen v. Sup erior Dev., Inc., (concluding that employee complained about adverse working condition by meeting with company’s vice president to discuss problem).
Superior Glass, Inc. v. Johnson 896 N.W.2d 137 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Superior Glass, Inc. v. Johnson 896 N.W.2d 137 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“This court will exercise its power to declare a statute unconstitutional only with extreme caution and when absolutely necessary.” Haugen v. Superior Dev., Inc., ().
A16-1504 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“This court will exercise its power to declare a statute unconstitutio nal only with extreme cau tion and when absolutely necessary.” Haugen v. Superior Dev., Inc., ().
Vincent Rosetta v. Quality Bicycle Products, Inc., Relator, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Vincent Rosetta v. Quality Bicycle Products, Inc., Relator, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
2 (2014); see also Haugen v Superior Dev., Inc., (holding that unemployment benefits are paid from state funds).
Patrick H. Horan, Relator v. Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Patrick H. Horan, Relator v. Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Haugen v. Superior Dev., Inc.
Cecilia Shaw, Relator v. First Advantage Background Services, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Cecilia Shaw, Relator v. First Advantage Background Services, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Haugen v. Superior Dev., Inc., (“[T]he statute is not meant to benefit employers specifically.
Vickie L. Carlson, Relator v. Young America, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Vickie L. Carlson, Relator v. Young America, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Haugen v. Superior Dev., Inc.
Crystal Sayen, Relator v. North Hennepin Community College, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
John L. Corrigan, Relator v. North Metro Harness Initiative, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Crystal Sayen, Relator v. North Hennepin Community College, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Haugen v. Superior Dev., Inc.
John L. Corrigan, Relator v. North Metro Harness Initiative, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Generally, “a substantial pay reduction gives an employee good cause for quitting.” Scott v. Photo Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 535, 536, Haugen v. Superior Dev., Inc., (noting that 6 “caselaw consistently establishes that a substantial wage or hours reduction is good reason to quit”).
Michelle Davidsavor, Relator v. Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Michelle Davidsavor, Relator v. Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
And the ULJ expressly found that “Davidsavor’s testimony that she was willing to be very flexible in accepting a job was credible.” “[W]e must defer to the ULJ’s factually supported credibility determination.” Haugen v. Superior Dev., Inc.
Pamela Beidel, Relator v. Corporate Commission of Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe Indians - Grand Casino Hinckley, Department … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Pamela Beidel, Relator v. Corporate Commission of Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe Indians - Grand Casino Hinckley, Department … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
This court will exercise its power to declare a statute unconstitutional only with extreme caution and when absolutely necessary.” Haugen v. Superior Dev., Inc., -21 (Minn. App. 2012) (citations omitted).
Benson Giwa, Relator v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Benson Giwa, Relator v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Haugen v. 7 Superior Dev., Inc.
Thao v. Command Center, Inc. 824 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Thao v. Command Center, Inc. 824 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Generally, “a substantial pay reduction gives an employee good cause for quitting.” Scott v. Photo Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 535, 536 , Haugen v. Superior Dev., Inc., (holding that “caselaw consistently establishes that a substantial wage or hours reduction is good reason to quit”); (holding that “wage cuts of 21-26 percent unilaterally imposed by the employer” were so unreasonable that employee