Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Ferguson v. State, 826 N.W.2d 808.

30 citing documents.

Lance Arnold Kingbird v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Dorothy L. Henschel v. MJ Business Services, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Michael Eugene Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
De-Aunteze Lavion Bobo, Minn. 2022
Ferguson v. State , 815 (Minn. 2013).
State of Minnesota v. Xavier Alfred Haywood Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Ernesto Reyes-Alcazar v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Compare Deegan v. State , (holding that a defendant’s right to the assistance of counsel under the Minnesota Constitu tion extends to one review of a criminal conviction, whether by direct appeal or a first r eview by postconviction proceeding), (stating defendant who was represented by counsel on direct appeal has no state co nstitutional right to counsel—“effective or otherwise”—in subsequent postconviction proceedings).
State of Minnesota v. Deddrick Terrell Whitaker Minn. Ct. App. 2018
efendant only if: (1) the declarant is unavailable to testify; 6 (2) the statement tended to “subject the declarant to civil or cri minal liability” at the time the statement was made, so that a reasonable person would not have made the statement unless they believed it to be true; and (3) “corroborating circumstances clearly indicate the trustworthiness of the statement.” (quoting Minn. R. Evid.
Wayne v. State 912 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 2018
Wayne v. State 912 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 2018
See Ferguson v. State , , 816 (Minn. 2013) (holding that after being represented on direct appeal, a defendant has no right to counsel in a subsequent postconviction proceeding).
State of Minnesota v. Ronald Ezel Scott Minn. Ct. App. 2018
804(b)(3) provided that a statement offered to exculpate the accused was “not admissible unless corroborating circumstances clearly indicate [its] trustworthiness.” Ferguson v. State , 3 (Minn. 2013) (quotation omitted) .
Minn. 2018
in a subsequent postconviction proceeding.”
Brent Lanier Lynch v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
VI; see also Minn. Const. art. I, § 6; Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 686, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2063 (1984)
Junious Taylor, Jr. v. State of Minnesota 887 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 2016
Junious Taylor, Jr. v. State of Minnesota 887 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 2016
The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 6, of the Minnesota Constitution guarantee a criminal defendant “the right to the effective assistance of counsel.” Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 686 (1984) (quoting McMann v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759, 771 n.14 (1970))
Prentis Cordell Jackson v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 272 Minn. 2016
Prentis Cordell Jackson v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 272 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Randal Anthony Daher Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Randal Anthony Daher Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Edbert Neal Williams v. State of Minnesota 869 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 2015
Edbert Neal Williams v. State of Minnesota 869 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 2015
See, (holding that there is no Sixth Amendment right to counsel in state postconviction proceedings).
Hassan Mohamed Abdillahi v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Hassan Mohamed Abdillahi v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Bradley James Richards Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Bradley James Richards Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Eugene Erick Fort v. State of Minnesota 861 N.W.2d 674 Minn. 2015
Eugene Erick Fort v. State of Minnesota 861 N.W.2d 674 Minn. 2015
VI; Minn. Const. art. 1, § 6
Miles v. State 840 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 2013
Miles v. State 840 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 2013
-15 (Minn.2013) (upholding the postconviction court’s determination that the hearsay affidavit was inadmissible because corroborating circumstances failed to establish its trustworthiness.)
Dobbins v. State 845 N.W.2d 148 Minn. 2013
Dobbins v. State 845 N.W.2d 148 Minn. 2013