Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Berkovitz v. State, 826 N.W.2d 203.
- Hughes v. State 851 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 2014
-
Hughes v. State
851 N.W.2d 49
Minn. 2014
4(b)(5) (providing that a court may consider a time-barred petition in the interests of justice only if the petition is not frivolous); (concluding that an ineffective-assistance-of-trial-counsel claim was frivolous because it had been previously presented and rejected on direct appeal).
- Hooper v. State 838 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 2013
-
Hooper v. State
838 N.W.2d 775
Minn. 2013
s whether the exceptions to the Knaffla rule remain applicable to petitions for postconviction relief because the State did not raise the issue); , 8 n. 3 (Minn.2013) (declining to reach the *788 issue of "whether the Knaffla exceptions remain applicable to petitions for postconviction relief” because the State did not raise the issue); , 210 n. 3 (Minn.2013) (concluding that this court need not address "whether the exceptions to the Knaffla rule survive the 2005 amendment to the postconviction