Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Berkovitz v. State, 826 N.W.2d 203.
- Russell Vincent Winbush, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- Albert George McIntosh, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
John Louis Corrigan, Jr., petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(stating when an appellant does not file petition for certiorari following supreme court’s decision on direct appeal, conviction becomes final 90 days thereafter).
- Ronald Lewis Greer v. State of Minnesota Minn. 2024
-
Ronald Lewis Greer v. State of Minnesota
Minn. 2024
(“When an appellant does not file a petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States following our decision on direct appeal, the appellant’s conviction becomes ‘final’ 90 days after our decision for purposes of Minn. Stat. § 590.01, subd.
-
Thomas Robert Tichich, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(“When an appellant does not file a petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States following [the Minnesota Supreme Court’s] decision on direct appeal, the appellant’s conviction becomes ‘final’ 90 days after [the Minnesota Supreme Court’s] decision .
- John Thomas Owen, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
- Lance Arnold Kingbird, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
-
Kevin Terrance Hannon,
Minn. 2021
A conviction is final under this statute when the time for filing a petition for a writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court has expired.11
-
A19-1083
Minn. 2020
(“ When an appellant does not file a petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States following our decision on direct appeal, the appellant’s conviction becomes ‘final’ 90 days after our decision for purposes of Minn. Stat. § 590.01, subd.
- Odell v. State 931 N.W.2d 103 Minn. 2019
-
Odell v. State
931 N.W.2d 103
Minn. 2019
See Berkovitz v. State , , 207 (Minn. 2013) (stating that a conviction becomes final for purposes of Minn. Stat. § 590.01 , subd.
- Jackson v. State 929 N.W.2d 903 Minn. 2019
-
Jackson v. State
929 N.W.2d 903
Minn. 2019
See Berkovitz v. State , , 207 (Minn. 2013).
- Munt v. State 920 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 2018
-
Munt v. State
920 N.W.2d 410
Minn. 2018
an appellate court's disposition of petitioner's direct appeal."); see also Berkovitz v. State , , 207 (Minn. 2013) (explaining that a conviction is final for purposes of Minn. Stat. § 590.01 , subd.
- Wayne v. State 912 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 2018
-
Wayne v. State
912 N.W.2d 633
Minn. 2018
Berkovitz v. State , , 209 (Minn. 2013).
-
Keith Henderson,
Minn. 2018
See Berkovitz v. State , (explaining that a decision becomes final 90 days after our decision when no petition for certiorari is filed with the Supreme Court of the United States).
-
Gary Leroy Reynolds, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(“When an appellant does not file a petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States following [the Minnesota appellate court’s] decision on direct appeal, the appellant’s conviction becomes ‘final’ 90 days after [the cour t’s] decision for purposes of Minn. Stat. § 590.01, subd
- Pearson v. State 891 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 2017
-
Pearson v. State
891 N.W.2d 590
Minn. 2017
1.”); , 210 n.3 (Minn. 2013) ("We need not, and do not, decide whether the exceptions to the Knaffla rule survive the 2005 amendment to the postconviction statute because, regardless of whether the exceptions apply, [petitioner’s] claims...
- Kevin Terrance Hannon v. State of Minnesota 889 N.W.2d 789 Minn. 2017
-
Kevin Terrance Hannon v. State of Minnesota
889 N.W.2d 789
Minn. 2017
(explaining that a conviction is final for purposes of section 590.01, subdivision 4(a)(2), when the time for filing a petition for certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court has lapsed).
- Freddie James Prewitt v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-
Freddie James Prewitt v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(determining that, for purposes of the two-year limitations period, the petitioner’s conviction became final 90 days after the Minnesota Supreme Court decided the direct appeal).
- Derrick Delmar Brocks v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 602 Minn. 2016
-
Derrick Delmar Brocks v. State of Minnesota
883 N.W.2d 602
Minn. 2016
(explaining that a conviction becomes “final” 90 days after our disposition on direct appeal if no writ of certiorari is filed with the United States Supreme Court).
- Ta-Raj Tondell Satari Benness v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Ta-Raj Tondell Satari Benness v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Jerome Emmanuel Davis v. State of Minnesota 880 N.W.2d 373 Minn. 2016
- Joel Marvin Munt v. State of Minnesota 880 N.W.2d 379 Minn. 2016
- Joel Marvin Munt v. State of Minnesota 880 N.W.2d 379 Minn. 2016
-
Jerome Emmanuel Davis v. State of Minnesota
880 N.W.2d 373
Minn. 2016
Act of June 2, 2005, ch. 136, art. 14, § 12, 2005 Minn. Laws 901, 1097; see Williams, d at 318 n.2; n.2 (Minn. 2013); n.3 (Minn. 2013).
- Craig Allan Hargreaves v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Craig Allan Hargreaves v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Robert Marlyn Taylor v. State of Minnesota 874 N.W.2d 429 Minn. 2016
-
Robert Marlyn Taylor v. State of Minnesota
874 N.W.2d 429
Minn. 2016
Taylor I, d at 196; (explaining that a conviction becomes “final” 90 days after our decision when the appellant does not file a petition for certiorari).
- Michael Wayne v. State of Minnesota 870 N.W.2d 389 Minn. 2015
- Michael Wayne v. State of Minnesota 870 N.W.2d 389 Minn. 2015
- Nissalke v. State 861 N.W.2d 88 Minn. 2015
-
Nissalke v. State
861 N.W.2d 88
Minn. 2015
1, which states that “[a] petition for postconviction relief after a direct appeal has been completed may not be based on grounds that could have been raised on direct appeal of the conviction or sentence.” See, , 210 n. 3 (Minn.2013) (concluding that we need not decide "whether the exceptions to the Knaffla rule survive the 2005 amendments to the postconviction statute” because the petitioner’s claims were clearly procedurally barred).
- Harold David Yaritz v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
Harold David Yaritz v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ct. R. 13.1 (requiring petitions for writ of certiorari to be filed within 90 days after entry of the state court order denying discretionary review); (concluding that, for purposes of applying the two-year limitation, the petitioner’s conviction became final 90 days after the Minnesota Supreme Court decided the petitioner’s direct appeal).
- Pedro Maldono Rodriguez, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
Pedro Maldono Rodriguez, Jr. v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(“When an appellant does not file a petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States following [the Minnesota Supreme Court’s] decision on direct appeal, the appellant’s conviction becomes ‘final’ 90 days after our decision for purposes of Minn. Stat. § 590.01, subd.
- Abdirisak Dahir Jama v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- Abdirisak Dahir Jama v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- Willie James Richardson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- Willie James Richardson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014