Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Johnson, 831 N.W.2d 917.

233 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Scott Anthony Hebert Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Daniel Alvin Hennen Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Daniel Alvin Hennen Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“We will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” State v. Johnson, 7 (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Charles Kenneth Redding Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Christopher Desjarlais Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Christopher Desjarlais Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Charles Kenneth Redding Minn. Ct. App. 2016
This court will affirm the imposition of the presumptive sentence “when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” d 917, 925 (Minn. App. 2013), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Robert Dornsbach Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Zaki Mohamed Sugule Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Zaki Mohamed Sugule Minn. Ct. App. 2016
But, “the district court is not required to explain its reasons for imposing a presumptive sentence.” 5 review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Robert Dornsbach Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(); (stating that “[w]e will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information 10 presented before making a determination” and that “[o]n
State of Minnesota v. Steven Andre Moore Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Steven Andre Moore Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(); (stating that “[w]e will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination” and that “[o]nly the rare case will merit reversal based on the d
State of Minnesota v. Lasheka Bolden Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Lasheka Bolden Minn. Ct. App. 2015
We will affirm the imposition of the presumptive sentence “when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Curtis Wayne Regguinti Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Curtis Wayne Regguinti Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Jose Luis Guzman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jose Luis Guzman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
11 sentence “when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Stephen Charles Iepson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Raymond Benjamin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Stephen Charles Iepson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A “search” occurs “upon an official’s 6 invasion of a person’s reasonable expectation of privacy.” d 917, 922 (Minn. App. 2013), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Raymond Benjamin Minn. Ct. App. 2015
This court “will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Kai Yang Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Kai Yang Minn. Ct. App. 2014
We affirm imposition of a presumptive sentence when “the record shows [that] the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Chris Gregerson v. Hennepin County and Tracey Martin Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Chris Gregerson v. Hennepin County and Tracey Martin Minn. Ct. App. 2014
A reasonable expectation of privacy exists as to areas and objects in which the person invoking the Fourth Amendment has a subjective expectation of privacy that society is prepared to recognize as reasonable.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Gary Richard Wessman Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Gary Richard Wessman Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. LaQuinn Jamul Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. LaQuinn Jamul Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“We will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information 6 presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Sep.
State of Minnesota v. Gary Michael Veesenmeyer-Trojanowski Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Gary Michael Veesenmeyer-Trojanowski Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by