Cited by

rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

“ We will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

7 circumstances different from those that would be present in a typical case.” rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

A “district court [is] not required to state its reasons for not departing on the record.” (), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

Nor is the district court “required to explain its reasons for imposing a presumptive sentence.” rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

(stating “the district court is not required to explain its reasons for imposing a presumptive sentence”), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

Accordingly, we will not disturb the district court ’s exercise of discretion in imposing “a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” State v. Johnson , (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

(quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

Moreover, although a district court need not explain its reasons for declining to depart from the guidelines, rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

6 (), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

(), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

DECISION This court “will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making its determination.” d 917, 925 (Minn. App. 2013) (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

“Only the rare case will merit reversal based 11 on the district court’s refusal to depart.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

However, “[w]hen the record contains evidence of factors supporting departure, which could have been, but were not, considered by the district court, we may remand for consideration of those factors.” -26 (Minn. App. 2013) (), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

A district court properly exercises its discretion “as long as the record shows [it] carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” Pegel, d at 255 (quotation omitted); rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

We will affirm a presumptive sentence if the record demonstrates that “the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

(), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

Heard maintains that the district court “did not expressly consider” his “suicidality at the time of the offense.” But a district court “is not required to explain its reasons for imposing a presumptive sentence.” rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

We will affirm the district court’s imposition of the 4 presumptive sentence when the record shows that it “carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” d 917, 925 (Minn. App. 2013) (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

Appellate courts “will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” State v. Johnson, 4 (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

As a result, “[w]hen the record contains evidence of factors supporting departure, which could have been, but were not, considered by the district court, we may remand for consideration of those factors.” -26 (Minn. App. 2013) (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

Appellate courts “will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

But “[w]hen the record contains evidence of factors supporting departure, which could have been, but were not, considered by the district court, we may remand for consideration of those factors.” -26 (Minn. App. 2013), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

And although it did, “the district court [was] not required to explain its reasons for imposing a presumptive sentence.” rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

We will affirm a presumptive sentence when the record shows that a district court “carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

-25 (Minn. App. 2013), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

“We will affirm the imposition of a presumptive guidelines sentence when the record shows that the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determination.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.

rev. denied (Minn. Sept.