Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Yarbrough, 841 N.W.2d 619.

131 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Gerald Steven Phillips Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Stuart Donald Luhm 880 N.W.2d 606 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Stuart Donald Luhm 880 N.W.2d 606 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
that illegal drug activity may be taking place at the target residence.” If a police officer is investigating a suspicion of drug-trafficking, it is “reasonable to infer that drug wholesalers keep drugs at their residences.”
State of Minnesota v. Earl Eugene Ashmore Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Earl Eugene Ashmore Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Dana Jerome Duncombe Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Dana Jerome Duncombe Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Minn. Stat. § 626.08 (2012)
State of Minnesota v. Robert James Fallin Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Robert James Fallin Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Probable cause exists if the judge issuing a warrant determines that ‘there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found.’” (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238, 103 S. Ct. 4 2317, 2332 (1983)).
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Nathan Benvie, Appellant.. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Nathan Benvie, Appellant.. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Probable cause exists if the judge issuing a warrant determines that ‘there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found.’” (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238, 103 S. Ct. 2317, 2332 (1983)).
State of Minnesota v. Andre Thomas Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Andre Thomas Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Vilaysack Sirimanothay Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Vilaysack Sirimanothay Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Minn. Stat. § 626.08 (2012)
State of Minnesota v. Wayne Joseph Simonson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Wayne Joseph Simonson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Thomas James Mitchell Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Thomas James Mitchell Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See, (“A sufficient ‘nexus’ must be established between the evidence sought and the place to be searched.”).
State of Minnesota v. Albert Hester, III Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Albert Hester, III Minn. Ct. App. 2015
2 “Before searching a residence, police usually must obtain a valid warrant issued by a neutral and detached magistrate.” as amended on denial of reh’g (Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Devon Griffen Seivers Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Devon Griffen Seivers Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Donald Timothy Palardis Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Donald Timothy Palardis Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Carliss David-Lee Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Carliss David-Lee Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(stating that probable cause to issue a search warrant requires a fair probability that the evidence will be found at the specific site to be searched).
State of Minnesota v. Janice Marie Cortes Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Janice Marie Cortes Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Antanie Devon Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Antanie Devon Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“When reviewing a decision to issue a search warrant, our review is limited to whether the judge issuing the warrant had a substantial basis for concluding that probable cause existed.” (quotation omitted).