Cummings v. Kelly Services & Indemnity Co. of North America
Cummings v. Kelly Services & Indemnity Co. of North America, 835 N.W.2d 472 (Minn. 2013).
Cited by
- Minnesota Department of Natural Resources v. Murray County Board of Adjustment, Edgewater Bay, LLC, … Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- City of Ellendale v. Daniel Petsinger, Carrie Petsinger Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- Masami Kiya v. Randy Jackson, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- State of Minnesota, by Spring Valley Friends, LLC, et al v. Riley Purgatory Bluff … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- Hiscox Insurance Company Minn. 2023
- In re the Matter of Joseph Rued v. the Commissioner of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- Phillip T. Kruger (A22-0348), Harvey Kruger, et al. (A22-0349) v. Kevin Nordquist (A22-0349), Heron … Minn. Ct. App. 2022
- Burl Peckman Individually and as Trustee of Burl W. Peckman Living Trust v. Roseau … Minn. Ct. App. 2022
- In the Matter of V & J Farm, LLC and the Commissioner of North … Minn. Ct. App. 2022
- The Gables at the Reserve Homeowners Association v. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2021
- Thomas Hecker v. Crow Wing County Board, Sunset Shores WF, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2021
- R.P. AIR, INC., et al v. Great Gulf Corporation, Jane Doe, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Hoff v. Kempton 317 N.W.2d 361
Opinion text
ORDER Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed and served on October 17, 2012, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that [s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case). BY THE COURT: /s/_ Alan C. Page Associate Justice WRIGHT, LILLEHAUG, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.